Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2011 Sep;3(3):167-9.
doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.84949.

Dog bite injuries of genitalia in male infant and children

Affiliations
Case Reports

Dog bite injuries of genitalia in male infant and children

Robin Bothra et al. Urol Ann. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to highlight genital dog bites in male infant and children in developing countries and their management. We managed three cases (9 months, 5 years, and 8 years) of genital dog bite between January 1997 and July 2008. Two had unprovoked stray dog bites and the third was bitten by his pet dog when disturbed during eating. Extent of injury varied from small-lacerated wound to near emasculation. Primary repair was done after thorough washing and debridement under antibiotic cover. In the 9-month-old male infant who was near emasculated, scrotum was closed with the available skin and a small penile stump was reconstructed after meatoplasty. Immunization against tetanus and rabies was done for all cases. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and the wound healed primarily in all cases. Parents of the infant were asked for feminizing genitoplasty but they refused so they were advised for hormonal replacement and penile reconstruction at adolescence. Male children are the most common victims of genital dog bites. These injuries can be repaired primarily with good outcome provided strict cleaning, debridement, wound repair, antibiotic cover, and immunization is applied.

Keywords: Dog bite; emasculation; injury; penis; reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Big wound with loss of penile shaft, testis, and scrotum. (b) Wound after thorough washing and debridement. (c) Reconstructed scrotum and meatus on very small penile stump after meatoplasty
Figure 2
Figure 2
Root of penis and teeth mark at penile shaft and medial side of left thigh

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Donovan JF, Kaplan WE. The therapy of genital trauma by dog bite. J Urol. 1989;141:63–5. - PubMed
    1. Wolf JS, Turzan C, Cattolica EV, McAnich JW. Dog bites to the male genitalia: Characteristics management and comparison to human bites. J Urol. 1993;149:286–9. - PubMed
    1. Redman JF. Genital dog bite injuries in infants and children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1995;34:331–3. - PubMed
    1. Kyriakidis A, Karydis G, Yannopoulos P. An unusual trauma of the glans penis. Br J Urol. 1979;51:161. - PubMed
    1. Cummings JM, Boullier JA. Scrotal dog bites. J Urol. 2000;164:57–8. - PubMed

Publication types