Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010:1:182-90.
doi: 10.3762/bjnano.1.22. Epub 2010 Dec 28.

Magnetic interactions between nanoparticles

Affiliations

Magnetic interactions between nanoparticles

Steen Mørup et al. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2010.

Abstract

We present a short overview of the influence of inter-particle interactions on the properties of magnetic nanoparticles. Strong magnetic dipole interactions between ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic particles, that would be superparamagnetic if isolated, can result in a collective state of nanoparticles. This collective state has many similarities to spin-glasses. In samples of aggregated magnetic nanoparticles, exchange interactions are often important and this can also lead to a strong suppression of superparamagnetic relaxation. The temperature dependence of the order parameter in samples of strongly interacting hematite nanoparticles or goethite grains is well described by a simple mean field model. Exchange interactions between nanoparticles with different orientations of the easy axes can also result in a rotation of the sub-lattice magnetization directions.

Keywords: dipole interactions; exchange interactions; spin structure; superferromagnetism; superparamagnetic relaxation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The relaxation time of 4.7 nm Fe100−xCx nearly monodisperse particles suspended in decalin as a function of temperature. The data were obtained from AC susceptibility measurements. The open circles are data from a dilute sample, whereas the full circles are data for a concentrated sample. The insets show a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the particles deposited on an amorphous carbon film and the corresponding particle size distribution obtained from the TEM images. Adapted from Djurberg, C.; Svedlindh, P.; Nordblad, P.; Hansen, M. F.; Bødker, F.; Mørup, S. Dynamics of an Interacting Particle System: Evidence of Critical Slowing Down, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 5154. Copyright (1997) by the American Physical Society.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic illustration of interacting magnetic nanoparticles. (a) Isolated nanoparticles dominated by superparamagnetic relaxation. (b) Interacting nanoparticles forming a dipole glass. (c) Nanoparticles forming a chain with aligned dipole moments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mössbauer spectra of 8 nm hematite particles (a) coated (non-interacting) and (b) uncoated (strongly interacting) nanoparticles. The spectra were obtained at the indicated temperatures. Reprinted from Frandsen, C.; Mørup, S. Spin rotation in α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles by interparticle interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 027202. Copyright (2005) by the American Physical Society.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Neutron diffraction data for interacting 8 nm α-Fe2O3 particles obtained at 20 K. The inset shows a TEM image of three α-Fe2O3 particles attached along their common [001] axis. The antiferromagnetic order is indicated by the blue and red arrows superimposed on the TEM image. Adapted from Frandsen, C.; Bahl, C. R. H.; Lebech, B.; Lefmann, K.; Kuhn, L. T.; Keller, L.; Andersen, N. H.; von Zimmermann, M.; Johnson, E.; Klausen, S. N.; Mørup, S. Oriented attachment and exchange coupling of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 214406. Copyright (2005) by the American Physical Society.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The normalized magnetic energy, E(θ)/KV (Equation 9) for different values of the ratio between the interaction energy JeffM2(T)b(T) and the anisotropy energy, KV.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Temperature dependence of the median value of the order parameter, b50(T) for interacting 20 nm hematite nanoparticles. The open squares are the experimental data, and the solid line is a fit to the superferromagnetism model (Equation 11). Adapted from Hansen, M. F. ; Koch, C. B.; Mørup, S. Magnetic dynamics of weakly and strongly interacting hematite nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, 1124. Copyright (2000) by the American Physical Society.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mössbauer spectra of 8 nm hematite nanoparticles ground in a mortar with η-Al2O3 nanoparticles for the indicated periods of time. (a) Spectra obtained at room temperature. (b) Spectra obtained at 80 K. Reprinted with permission from Xu, M.; Bahl, C. R. H.; Frandsen, C.; Mørup, S. Inter-particle interactions in agglomerates of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles: Influence of grinding, J. Colloid Interface Science 2004, 279 132–136. Copyright (2004) by Elsevier.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) The quadrupole shift of coated (open circles) and uncoated (solid circles) 8 nm hematite particles as a function of temperature. (b) The quadrupole shift of uncoated hematite nanoparticles at 20 K as a function of particle size. Reprinted from Frandsen, C.; Mørup, S. Spin rotation in α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles by interparticle interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 027202. Copyright (2005) by the American Physical Society.

References

    1. Berkowitz A E, Takano K. J Magn Magn Mater. 1999;200:552–570. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00453-9. - DOI
    1. Nogués J, Schuller I K. J Magn Magn Mater. 1999;192:203–232. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00266-2. - DOI
    1. Nogués J, Sort J, Langlais V, Skumryev V, Suriñach S, Muñoz J S, Baró M D. Phys Rep. 2005;442:65–117. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.004. - DOI
    1. Meiklejohn W H, Bean C P. Phys Rev. 1956;102:1413–1414. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.102.1413. - DOI
    1. van der Zaag P J, Ijiri Y, Borchers J A, Feiner L F, Wolf R M, Gaines J M, Erwin R W, Verheijen M A. Phys Rev Lett. 2000;84:6102–6105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.6102. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources