Critical Needs and Gaps in Understanding Prevention, Amelioration, and Resolution of Lyme and Other Tick-Borne Diseases: The Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes
- PMID: 21977545
- Bookshelf ID: NBK57020
- DOI: 10.17226/13134
Critical Needs and Gaps in Understanding Prevention, Amelioration, and Resolution of Lyme and Other Tick-Borne Diseases: The Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes
Excerpt
It was obvious to participants at the workshop that a significant impasse has developed in the world of Lyme disease. There are conflicts within and among the science; policy; politics; medicine; and professional, public, and patient views pertaining to the subject, which have created significant misunderstandings, strong emotions, mistrust, and a game of blaming others who are not aligned with one’s views. Lines in the sand have been drawn, sides have been taken, and frustration prevails. The “walk in the woods” process of conflict resolution or a similar process seems necessary for creating a new environment of trust and a better environment for more constructive dialogue to help focus research needs and achieve better outcomes. Such a process does not imply a compromise of the science but rather is needed to shift to a more positive and productive environment to optimize critical research and promote new collaborations.
Copyright © 2011, National Academy of Sciences.
Sections
- The National Academies
- Committee on Lyme Disease and other Tick-borne Diseases: The State of the Science
- Reviewers
- Preface: A Walk in the Woods
- Acronyms
- Overview
- 1. Introduction
- 2. An Overview of Tick-Borne Diseases
- 3. The Social Construction and Human Face of Tick-Borne Disease
- 4. Emerging Infections, Tick Biology, and Host–Vector Interactions
- 5. Surveillance, Spectrum, and Burden of Tick-Borne Disease, and At-Risk Populations
- 6. Pathogenesis
- 7. Diagnostics and Diagnosis
- 8. Prevention
- 9. Closing Panels
- References
- Appendixes
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
