Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule
- PMID: 21980059
- PMCID: PMC3425336
- DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-1764
Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule
Abstract
Background: The detection of pulmonary nodules (PNs) is likely to increase, especially with the release of the National Lung Screen Trials. When tissue diagnosis is desired, transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) is recommended. Several guided-bronchoscopy technologies have been developed to improve the yield of transbronchial biopsy for PN diagnosis: electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB), virtual bronchoscopy (VB), radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS), ultrathin bronchoscope, and guide sheath. We undertook this meta-analysis to determine the overall diagnostic yield of guided bronchoscopy using one or a combination of the modalities described here.
Methods: We performed a MEDLINE search using “bronchoscopy” and “solitary pulmonary nodule.” Studies evaluating the diagnostic yield of ENB, VB, R-EBUS, ultrathin bronchoscope, and/or guide sheath for peripheral nodules were included. The overall diagnostic yield and yield based on size were extracted. Adverse events, if reported, were recorded. Meta-analysis techniques incorporating inverse variance weighting and a random-effects meta-analysis approach were used.
Results: A total of 3,052 lesions from 39 studies were included. The pooled diagnostic yield was 70%, which is higher than the yield for traditional transbronchial biopsy. The yield increased as the lesion size increased. The pneumothorax rate was 1.5%, which is significantly smaller than that reported for TTNA.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that the diagnostic yield of guided bronchoscopic techniques is better than that of traditional transbronchial biopsy. Although the yield remains lower than that of TTNA, the procedural risk is lower. Guided bronchoscopy may be an alternative or be complementary to TTNA for tissue sampling of PN, but further study is needed to determine its role in the evaluation of peripheral pulmonary lesions.
Figures



Comment in
-
Bronchoscopy for the solitary pulmonary nodule: friend or foe?Chest. 2012 Aug;142(2):276-277. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0135. Chest. 2012. PMID: 22871747 No abstract available.
References
-
- Stern SH. Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT): Tabulation and Graphical Summary of 2000 Survey of Computed Tomography. Frankfort, KY: Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc; 2007
-
- Wahidi MM, Govert JA, Goudar RK, Gould MK, McCrory DC; American College of Chest Physicians Evidence for the treatment of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132(suppl 3):94S-107S - PubMed
-
- Gould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD, et al. ; American College of Chest Physicians Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132(suppl 3):108S-130S - PubMed
-
- Rivera MP, Mehta AC; American College of Chest Physicians Initial diagnosis of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132(suppl 3):131S-148S - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical