Urogenital fistula in the UK: a personal case series managed over 25 years

Abstract

Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Whilst several very large series of obstetric fistulae from the developing world have been published, data on fistulae as seen in the developed world are relatively few. Most fistulae in the UK are known to follow hysterectomy, and several risk factors are recognised. We have confirmed the common association with pelvic surgery, and in particular hysterectomy, but also show the broad range of other associated operations, including so called 'minimally invasive' procedures. High rates of both anatomical fistula closure and continence are shown, when a consistent approach to assessment, selection of surgical procedure, and postoperative care are applied. Successful closure is seen more often in women who have not undergone previous attempts at repair before referral, and as a result a pattern of surpra-regional management is proposed. Whilst overall the number of urogenital fistulae seen in the UK appears to be decreasing, there is a suggestion from these data that the rate of fistula formation following hysterectomy may be increasing; we are currently investigating this possibility through detailed interrogation of a national dataset.

Objective: To review demography, aetiology, surgery and outcomes of women with urogenital fistula seen in one unit over the last 25 years; to provide data for comparison with a parallel study based on Hospital Episode Statistics.

Patients and methods: This is a prospective case series from a tertiary urogynaecology centre providing a de facto supra-regional fistula service. The women included had confirmed urogenital fistula referred between January 1986 and December 2010. Index cases were identified from a surgical database; data were entered prospectively and updated as appropriate; statistics are largely descriptive. The primary outcome is the patient's report of absence of urinary leakage. Secondary outcomes include operative or postoperative complications, anatomical closure of the fistula, other residual or new urinary symptoms, and the need for further intervention.

Results: In all, 348 women with urogenital fistula were referred; two-thirds were of surgical aetiology, with almost half following hysterectomy. Although 11% followed childbirth, most of these followed operative obstetric interventions. Spontaneous closure occurred in 6.9% of women and 291 underwent surgical treatment. The anatomical closure rate at first operation was 95.7%, although 2.2% reported residual urinary incontinence. The success rates were similar regardless of aetiology, although successful fistula closure was significantly more likely in women who had not had attempts at closure before referral (98.2 vs 88.2%; Fisher's exact test; P= 0.003).

Conclusion: High rates of fistula closure are reported regardless of aetiology, although previous unsuccessful repair militates against successful outcome; this emphasises the appropriateness of centralisation of the management of this increasingly rare condition in UK practice.