Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;107(4):709-18.
doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03581.x. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

Beyond drug use: a systematic consideration of other outcomes in evaluations of treatments for substance use disorders

Affiliations

Beyond drug use: a systematic consideration of other outcomes in evaluations of treatments for substance use disorders

Stephen T Tiffany et al. Addiction. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Across the addictions field, the primary outcome in treatment research has been reduction in drug consumption. A comprehensive view of the impact of substance use disorders on human functioning suggests that effective treatments should address the many consequences and features of addiction beyond drug use, a recommendation forwarded by multiple expert panels and review papers. Despite recurring proposals, and a compelling general rationale for moving beyond drug use as the sole standard for evaluating addiction treatment, the field has yet to adopt any core set of 'other' measures that are routinely incorporated into treatment research. Among the many reasons for the limited impact of previous proposals has been the absence of a clear set of guidelines for selecting candidate outcomes. This paper is the result of the deliberations of a panel of substance abuse treatment and research experts convened by the National Institute on Drug Abuse to discuss appropriate outcome measures for clinical trials of substance abuse treatments. This paper provides an overview of previous recommendations and outlines specific guidelines for consideration of candidate outcomes. A list of outcomes meeting those guidelines is described and illustrated in detail with two outcomes: craving and quality of life. The paper concludes with specific recommendations for moving beyond the outcome listing offered in this paper to promote the programmatic incorporation of these outcomes into treatment research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Murphy SA, Lynch KG, Oslin D, McKay JR, TenHave T. Developing adaptive treatment strategies in substance abuse research. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88S:S24–S30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Witkiewitz K, Marlatt GA. Overview of harm reduction treatments for alcohol problems. Int J Drug Policy. 2006;17:285–294.
    1. McLellan AT. Congratulations on the 10-year anniversary of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trial Network—Now, what's new for the coming decade? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;38:S1–S3. - PubMed
    1. Maisto SA, Cooper AM. A historical perspective on alcohol and drug treatment outcome research. In: Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Ward E, editors. Evaluating alcohol and drug abuse treatment effectivenes. Pergamon Press; New York: 1980. pp. 1–14.
    1. Pattison EM, Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Emerging concepts of alcohol dependence. Springer Publishing; New York: 1977.

Publication types

MeSH terms