Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 7:6:22.
doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-22.

Joint hypermobility in children with idiopathic scoliosis: SOSORT award 2011 winner

Dariusz Czaprowski  1 , Tomasz Kotwicki, Paulina Pawłowska, Lukasz Stoliński
Affiliations

Joint hypermobility in children with idiopathic scoliosis: SOSORT award 2011 winner

Dariusz Czaprowski et al. Scoliosis. .

Abstract

Background: Generalized joint hypermobility (JHM) refers to increased joint mobility with simultaneous absence of any other systemic disease. JHM involves proprioception impairment, increased frequency of pain within joints and tendency to injure soft tissues while performing physical activities. Children with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) often undergo intensive physiotherapy requiring good physical capacities. Further, some physiotherapy methods apply techniques that increase joint mobility and thus may be contraindicated.The aim of this paper was to assess JHM prevalence in children with idiopathic scoliosis and to analyze the relationship between JHM prevalence and the clinical and radiological parameters of scoliosis. The methods of assessment of generalized joint hypermobility were also described.

Materials and methods: This case-control study included 70 subjects with IS, aged 9-18 years (mean 13.2 ± 2.2), Cobb angle range 10°-53° (mean 24.3 ± 11.7), 34 presenting single curve thoracic scoliosis and 36 double curve thoracic and lumbar scoliosis. The control group included 58 children and adolescents aged 9-18 years (mean 12.6 ± 2.1) selected at random. The presence of JHM was determined using Beighton scale complemented with the questionnaire by Hakim and Grahame. The relationship between JHM and the following variables was evaluated: curve severity, axial rotation of the apical vertebra, number of curvatures (single versus double), number of vertebrae within the curvature (long versus short curves), treatment type (physiotherapy versus bracing) and age.Statistical analysis was performed with Statistica 8.1 (StatSoft, USA). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, U Mann-Whitney test, Chi2 test, Pearson and Spermann correlation rank were conducted. The value p = 0.05 was adopted as the level of significance.

Results: JHM was diagnosed in more than half of the subjects with idiopathic scoliosis (51.4%), whilst in the control group it was diagnosed in only 19% of cases (p = 0.00015). A significantly higher JHM prevalence was observed in both girls (p = 0.0054) and boys (p = 0.017) with IS in comparison with the corresponding controls. No significant relation was found between JHM prevalence and scoliosis angular value (p = 0.35), apical vertebra rotation (p = 0.86), the number of vertebrae within curvature (p = 0.8), the type of applied treatment (p = 0.55) and the age of subjects (p = 0.79). JHM prevalence was found to be higher in children with single curve scoliosis than in children with double curve scoliosis (p = 0.03).

Conclusions: JHM occurs more frequently in children with IS than in healthy sex and age matched controls. No relation of JHM with radiological parameters, treatment type and age was found. Systematically searched in IS children, JHM should be taken into account when physiotherapy is planned.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Extension of the MCP joint of the fifth finger.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Abduction of the thumb to the forearm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Elbow hyperextension.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Knee hyperextension.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Touching the floor with the palms of the hands.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Passive hyperextension of all MCPs of the II-V fingers to a position parallel to the extensor aspect of the forearm.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Ankle dorsiflexion.
Figure 8
Figure 8
I - < 45° of passive thumb abduction.
Figure 9
Figure 9
II - 45° of thumb abduction.
Figure 10
Figure 10
III - 90° of thumb abduction.
Figure 11
Figure 11
IV - 135° of thumb abduction.
Figure 12
Figure 12
V - Thumb opposed to the forearm (as in the Beighton scale).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sherry DD, Malleson P. In: Textbook of Pediatric Rheumatology. Cassidy JJT, Petty RE, editor. Philadelphia: Saunders Comp; 2001. Nonrheumatic Musculoskeletal Pain; pp. 362–363.
    1. Gedalia A, Person DA, Brewer EJ Jr, Gianini EH. Hypermobility of the joints in juvenile episodic arthritis/arthralgia. Journal of Pediatrics. 1985;107:873–876. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(85)80178-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vougiouka O, Moustaki M, Tsanaktsi M. Benign hypermobility syndrome in Greek schoolchildren. Eur J Ped. 2000;159(8):628. doi: 10.1007/PL00008391. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hakim A, Grahame R. Joint hypermobility. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2003;17(6):989–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2003.08.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lamari NM, Chueire AG, Cordeiro JA. Analysis of joint mobility patterns among preschool children. Sao Paolo Medical Journal. 2005;123(3):119–123. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources