Improving sleep at altitude: a comparison of therapies

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare 3 treatment modalities during sleep at an altitude of 5300 m to identify strategies for reducing the incidence of periodic breathing at high altitude.

Methods: Fifteen trekkers, with identical ascent profiles and no signs or symptoms of altitude illness, served as subjects. All study participants arrived at 5300 m after a gradual ascent from 1300 m. On their second night at 5300 m, subjects were randomly assigned (with a computer-based random assignment procedure) to 1 of 4 different treatment groups: control (n = 4); 1 L/min O(2) via a demand system during sleep (n = 3); 1 L/min O(2)/CO(2) mix (1.5% CO(2)) via a demand system during sleep (n = 4); or 125 mg acetazolamide 30 minutes before bedtime (n = 4). Heart rate, respiration rate, blood oxygen saturation, tidal volume, minute volume, and apnea hypopnea index were measured.

Results: Upon comparing the 4 groups, there were no statistically significant differences between the variables. One-way analysis of variance indicated a trend toward statistical significance for SaO(2) between groups (F = 2.9, P = .08), and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc tests indicated a trend in the SaO(2) difference between the 1 L/min oxygen and control groups (P = .07). While 1-way analysis of variance suggested no difference for respiratory rate between groups (F = 2.5, P = .1), Tukey HSD indicated a trend in statistical difference of the respiratory rate between 1 L/min O(2) and 1 L/min O(2)/CO(2) mixture (P = .08).

Conclusions: These statistical trends found between control and treatment groups indicate that further study is warranted.