A prospective multicenter study on the outcome of type I collagen hydrogel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (CaReS) for the repair of articular cartilage defects in the knee
- PMID: 21984690
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546511423369
A prospective multicenter study on the outcome of type I collagen hydrogel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (CaReS) for the repair of articular cartilage defects in the knee
Abstract
Background: The Cartilage Regeneration System (CaReS) is a novel matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) technique for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions (Outerbridge grades III and IV). For this technology, no expansion of the chondrocytes in a monolayer culture is needed, and a homogeneous cell distribution within the gel is guaranteed.
Purpose: To report a prospective multicenter study of matrix-associated ACI of the knee using a new type I collagen hydrogel (CaReS).
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: From 2003 to 2008, 116 patients (49 women and 67 men; mean age, 32.5 ± 8.9 years) had CaReS implantation of the knee in 9 different centers. On the basis of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package 2000, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, pain score (visual analog scale [VAS]), SF-36 score, overall treatment satisfaction and the IKDC functional status were evaluated. Patient follow-up was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and annually thereafter. Mean follow-up was 30.2 ± 17.4 months (range, 12-60 months). There were 67 defects of the medial condyle, 14 of the lateral, 22 of the patella/trochlea, and 3 of the tibial plateau, and 10 patients had 2 lesions. The mean defect size was 5.4 ± 2.4 cm(2). Thirty percent of the defects were <4 cm(2) and 70% were >4 cm(2).
Results: The IKDC score improved significantly from 42.4 ± 13.8 preoperatively to 70.5 ± 18.7 (P < .001) at latest follow-up. Global pain level significantly decreased (P < .001) from 6.7 ± 2.2 preoperatively to 3.2 ± 3.1 at latest follow-up. There also was a significant increase of both components of the SF-36 score. The overall treatment satisfaction was judged as very good or good in 88% by the surgeon and 80% by the patient. The IKDC functional knee status was grade I in 23.4%, II in 56.3%, III in 17.2%, and IV in 3.1% of the patients.
Conclusion: Matrix-associated ACI employing the CaReS technology for the treatment of chondral or osteochondral defects of the knee is a safe and clinically effective treatment that yields significant functional improvement and improvement in pain level. However, further investigation is necessary to determine the long-term viability and clinical outcome of this procedure.
Similar articles
-
Repair of focal cartilage defects with scaffold-assisted autologous chondrocyte grafts: clinical and biomechanical results 48 months after transplantation.Am J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1697-705. doi: 10.1177/0363546511403279. Epub 2011 May 3. Am J Sports Med. 2011. PMID: 21540360
-
Treatment of full-thickness chondral defects of the knee with autologous chondrocyte implantation: a functional evaluation with long-term follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):562-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546511428778. Epub 2011 Dec 2. Am J Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22138109
-
Autologous chondrocyte implantation in chondral defects of the knee with a type I/III collagen membrane: a prospective study with a 3-year follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2007 Apr;23(4):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.003. Arthroscopy. 2007. PMID: 17418330
-
Do meta-analyses reveal time-dependent differences between the clinical outcomes achieved by microfracture and autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee?J Orthop Sci. 2013 Nov;18(6):940-8. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0449-3. Epub 2013 Aug 10. J Orthop Sci. 2013. PMID: 23934147 Review.
-
Articular Cartilage Repair of the Pediatric and Adolescent Knee with Regard to Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Systematic Review.Cartilage. 2020 Jan;11(1):9-18. doi: 10.1177/1947603518783503. Epub 2018 Jul 2. Cartilage. 2020. PMID: 29962234 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Development of a pilot cartilage surgery register.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 30;18(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1638-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. PMID: 28666432 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee in the United States.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Sep;22(9):2070-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2614-9. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. PMID: 23896943
-
Effects of cell phenotype and seeding density on the chondrogenic capacity of human osteoarthritic chondrocytes in type I collagen scaffolds.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Mar 30;15(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01617-6. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32228637 Free PMC article.
-
Skeletal tissue regeneration: where can hydrogels play a role?Int Orthop. 2014 Sep;38(9):1861-76. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2402-2. Epub 2014 Jun 27. Int Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24968789 Review.
-
Crosslinking substrate regulates frictional properties of tissue-engineered cartilage and chondrocyte response to loading.Commun Mater. 2025;6(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s43246-025-00781-8. Epub 2025 Mar 27. Commun Mater. 2025. PMID: 40162094 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical