Affordable ART: a different perspective
- PMID: 21987524
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der323
Affordable ART: a different perspective
Abstract
Background: Although ≈ 10% of the population is affected by infertility, the treatment option of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) remains unaffordable for the majority of infertile couples. We have initiated a lowcost programme incorporating an uncommonly used, but recognized, ovarian stimulation protocol, together with certain costlimiting initiatives in an established assisted reproductive technology (ART) set up.
Methods: The medical records of women who underwent the lowcost programme were analysed. Clomiphene citrate 50 mg daily was administered from Day 2 of the cycle and continued till the day of hCG trigger, thus preventing the LH surge. Intermittent doses of human menopausal gonadotrophin 150 IU were administered on alternate days from the 5th day onwards. Oocyte retrieval was carried out once at least two follicles of >18 mm were identified. The cycle was monitored by ultrasound only, with embryo transfer being carried out on Day 3. Clinical outcomes were recorded together with an estimation of the direct costs per cycle. Direct cost calculations did not include professional charges or facility costs.
Results: Of 143 women evaluated, 104 women underwent embryo transfer. The live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer were 19 and 22%. The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 14% (20/143). The multiple pregnancy rate was 26% with no case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome being recorded. The average direct cost per cycle was US$ 675 for IVF and US$ 725 for an ICSI treatment cycle.
Conclusions: Using this protocol, together with several costcutting measures, we achieved an acceptable live birth rate per transfer of 19% at a reasonable cost. This approach could be used by established ART centres to provide treatment to couples who cannot afford conventional ART.
Similar articles
-
Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.Hum Reprod. 2013 Dec;28(12):3236-46. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det386. Epub 2013 Oct 27. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 24166594
-
Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles.Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1976. Epub 2013 Aug 28. Fertil Steril. 2013. PMID: 23993928
-
Flexible ovarian stimulation in a poor responder: a case report and literature review.Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Apr;26(4):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Dec 8. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013. PMID: 23497915 Review.
-
[Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;48(11):838-42. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24444561 Chinese.
-
Influence of human chorionic gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation: an overview.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Aug 6;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00639-3. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020. PMID: 32762698 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
IVF and other ART in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic landscape analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Feb 19;27(2):213-228. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa047. Hum Reprod Update. 2021. PMID: 33238297 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Financial costs of assisted reproductive technology for patients in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Mar 1;2023(2):hoad007. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad007. eCollection 2023. Hum Reprod Open. 2023. PMID: 36959890 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to access to infertility care and assisted reproductive technology within the public health sector in Brazil.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(4):221-6. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012. PMID: 24753912 Free PMC article.
-
Infertility care and the introduction of new reproductive technologies in poor resource settings.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Sep 8;12:87. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-87. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014. PMID: 25201070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The landscape of assisted reproductive technology access in India.Reprod Fertil. 2024 Oct 1;5(4):e240079. doi: 10.1530/RAF-24-0079. Online ahead of print. Reprod Fertil. 2024. PMID: 39401134 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical