Determination of patient concerns in choosing surgery and preference for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and assessment of satisfaction with postoperative cosmesis
- PMID: 21988162
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0181
Determination of patient concerns in choosing surgery and preference for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and assessment of satisfaction with postoperative cosmesis
Abstract
background and purpose: Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery offers potential improvements in cosmesis and recovery over standard laparoscopy (SL). We report the factors with which patients are most concerned in choosing surgery and how these affect preference for LESS. In addition, we rate the satisfaction of scars after laparoscopy.
Patients and methods: Patients followed after a laparoscopic procedure completed two surveys. First, patients rated, on a 5-point Likert scale, the importance of pain, recovery time, cost, treatment success, scars, and complications in choosing surgery. In addition, they were asked their preference for LESS. In the second survey, the impact of scars on body image and cosmesis was assessed.
Results: Seventy-nine patients (median age 54.8 years, 65% male and 35% female) were treated for malignancy (53), donation (15), and benign indications (9). Treatment success (4.71 ± 0.81) and complications (4.22 ± 1.16) were most important, followed by pain (3.43 ± 1.21) and convalescence (3.65 ± 1.11), P<0.05. Cost was rated 2.68 ± 1.38, and cosmesis was 2.22 ± 1.13 (P<0.005). Cosmesis score increased in females (2.59 ± 1.08 vs 2.02 ± 1.12), patients <50 years (2.59 ± 1.09 vs 2.02 ± 1.12), and benign surgical indication (3.33 ± 1.12 vs 2.07 ± 1.06), P<0.05. LESS was preferred in 30.4%, SL in 39.2%. Concern for cosmesis was associated with LESS preference (48.5% vs 17.8%, P=0.004). Sex, age, and surgical indication also influenced this. On the body image scale, patients scored a mean 18.8 ± 1.5 of 20. Patients rated scar appearance 8.31 ± 1.80 of 10.
Conclusion: Patients who were treated with laparoscopy were most concerned with success and complication. Preference for LESS was influenced by concerns for cosmesis, sex, age, and surgical indication.
Comment in
-
Re: determination of patient concerns in choosing surgery and preference for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and assessment of satisfaction with postoperative cosmesis.J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):974-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.092. Epub 2013 Jan 22. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23394652 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Patient-reported body image and cosmesis outcomes following kidney surgery: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, laparoscopic, and open surgery.Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Aug 12. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21856076
-
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for hysterectomy: long-term outcomes of abdominal incisional scar.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;40(2):217-221. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1606183. Epub 2019 Jul 26. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. PMID: 31347412
-
Importance of cosmesis to patients undergoing renal surgery: a comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS), laparoscopic and open surgery.BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2):268-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10784.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22177193
-
Changing our view of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: a review of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and a report on new approaches.Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 Aug;6(3):151-7. doi: 10.1111/ases.12041. Epub 2013 Jun 7. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23741981 Review.
-
Minilaparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: mini- and single-scar in urology.Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012 Jan;21(1):8-25. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2011.650179. Epub 2012 Jan 3. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012. PMID: 22211914 Review.
Cited by
-
An investigation for public acceptance of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.Pak J Med Sci. 2013 May;29(3):719-24. doi: 10.12669/pjms.293.3272. Pak J Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 24353615 Free PMC article.
-
What about vaginal extraction of the kidney? results of an online survey.Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):78-82. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0170. Int Braz J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27136470 Free PMC article.
-
Is LESS really more?Indian J Urol. 2012 Jan;28(1):82-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.94963. Indian J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22557724 Free PMC article.
-
Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery: recent advances in urology.Cent European J Urol. 2012;65(4):204-11. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2012.04.art5. Epub 2012 Dec 11. Cent European J Urol. 2012. PMID: 24578963 Free PMC article.
-
Surgery: are we likely to see more of LESS in urological surgery?Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Mar 27;9(4):185-6. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.44. Nat Rev Urol. 2012. PMID: 22450603 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical