Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Nov;50(11):823-34.
doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.595016.

Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification

Monique C J Leensen et al. Int J Audiol. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: In the Netherlands three internet-based self-screening tests have been developed; the National Hearing Test (NHT), Earcheck (EC), and Occupational Earcheck (OEC). These tests are adaptive speech-in-noise tests using either digit triplets or monosyllables, presented in stationary speech-shaped noise. These tests can be highly valuable in increasing the awareness and prevention of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This study evaluates these online speech-in-noise tests and investigates their potential to detect NIHL.

Design: In a multi-centre study the results of the three online screening tests are compared to pure-tone audiometry and to the Dutch sentence SRT test ( Plomp & Mimpen, 1979a ), which is considered the clinical standard.

Study sample: In total, 49 normal-hearing listeners and 49 patients with different degrees of NIHL participated.

Results: The online tests show good reliability, but there is much overlap in outcomes between normal-hearing listeners and participants with early NIHL. In addition, rather low correlations of the test results with both the Dutch sentence SRT test and pure-tone thresholds are found. These findings result in rather low test sensitivity: 54% (NHT) and 51% (EC), or low specificity: 49% (OEC).

Conclusions: The online screening tests in their current form are unsuitable to be used for early NIHL screening purposes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources