High false-negative rate of HER2 quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of the Oncotype DX test: an independent quality assurance study
- PMID: 21990395
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.7963
High false-negative rate of HER2 quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of the Oncotype DX test: an independent quality assurance study
Abstract
Purpose: HER2 (ERBB2) status is an important prognostic and predictive marker in breast carcinoma. In recent years, Genomic Health (GHI), purveyors of the Oncotype DX test, has been separately reporting HER2 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to oncologists. Because of the lack of independent evaluation, this quality assurance study was undertaken to define the concordance rate between immunohistochemistry (IHC)/fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and GHI RT-PCR HER2 assay.
Methods: All patients at three participating laboratories (Magee-Womens Hospital [Pittsburgh, PA], Cleveland Clinic [Cleveland, OH], and Riverside Methodist Hospital [Columbus, OH]) with available HER2 RT-PCR results from GHI were included in this study. All IHC-positive and equivocal patient cases were further evaluated and classified by FISH at respective laboratories.
Results: Of the total 843 patient cases, 784 (93%) were classified as negative, 36 (4%) as positive, and 23 (3%) as equivocal at the three institutions using IHC/FISH. Of the 784 negative patient cases, 779 (99%) were also classified as negative by GHI RT-PCR assay. However, all 23 equivocal patient cases were reported as negative by GHI. Of the 36 positive cases, only 10 (28%; 95% CI, 14% to 45%) were reported as positive, 12 (33%) as equivocal, and 14 (39%) as negative.
Conclusion: There was an unacceptable false-negative rate for HER2 status with GHI HER2 assay in this independent study. This could create confusion in the decision-making process for targeted treatment and potentially lead to mismanagement of patients with breast cancer if only GHI HER2 information is used.
Comment in
-
Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and the Oncotype DX test for assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status: time to reflect again?J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 10;29(32):4219-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.5824. Epub 2011 Oct 11. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21990408 No abstract available.
-
Oncotype DX test on unequivocally HER2-positive cases: potential for harm.J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 10;30(5):570-1. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1323. Epub 2012 Jan 9. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22231038 No abstract available.
-
Researchers find discordance between standard human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing and HER2 status reported on Oncotype DX.CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Mar-Apr;62(2):71-2. doi: 10.3322/caac.21133. Epub 2012 Jan 18. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012. PMID: 22259018 No abstract available.
-
Concordance between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and fluorescent in situ hybridization.J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 10;30(14):1726-7; author reply 1728-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0092. Epub 2012 Apr 9. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22493420 No abstract available.
-
Accurate assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 10;30(14):1727-8; author reply 1728-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0001. Epub 2012 Apr 9. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22493424 No abstract available.
-
Recognition and handling of discordant negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 classification by Oncotype DX in patients with breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3313-4; author reply 3314-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.1990. Epub 2012 May 29. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22649153 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
