Long-term follow-up analysis of HD9601 trial comparing ABVD versus Stanford V versus MOPP/EBV/CAD in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a study from the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi
- PMID: 21990405
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.9799
Long-term follow-up analysis of HD9601 trial comparing ABVD versus Stanford V versus MOPP/EBV/CAD in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a study from the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi
Abstract
Purpose: The Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi HD9601 trial compared doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) versus doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechloretamine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, and prednisone (Stanford V [StV]) versus the combination of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone (MOPP) with epidoxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine (EBV), lomustine, doxorubicin, and vindesine (CAD) (MOPP/EBV/CAD [MEC]) for the initial treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma to select which regimen would best support a reduced radiotherapy program (limited to two or fewer sites of either previous bulky or partially remitting disease). Superiority of ABVD and MEC to StV was demonstrated. We report analysis of long-term outcome and toxicity.
Patients and methods: Patients with stage IIB, III, or IV were randomly assigned among six cycles of ABVD, three cycles of StV, and six cycles of MEC; radiotherapy was administered in 76, 71, and 50 patients in the three arms, respectively.
Results: Currently, the median follow-up is 86 months; in the prolonged observation period, eight additional failures, including two relapses, both in the StV arm, and six additional deaths in complete response were recorded. The 10-year overall survival rates were 87%, 80%, and 78% for ABVD, MEC, and StV, respectively (P = .4). The 10-year failure-free survival was 75%, 74%, and 49% in the ABVD, MEC, and StV arms, respectively (P < .001). The 10-year disease-free survival of patients treated or not with radiotherapy (RT) showed no difference for ABVD or MEC (85% v 80% and 93% v 68%), and a statistically significant difference for StV (76% v 33%; P = .004). No significant long-term toxicity was recorded.
Conclusion: The long-term analysis confirmed ABVD and MEC superiority to StV. The use of RT after StV was established as mandatory. ABVD is still to be considered as the standard treatment with a good balance between efficacy and toxicity.
Comment in
-
More is not necessarily better when treating Hodgkin's lymphoma.J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 10;29(32):4215-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.1377. Epub 2011 Oct 11. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21990411 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
ABVD versus modified stanford V versus MOPPEBVCAD with optional and limited radiotherapy in intermediate- and advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: final results of a multicenter randomized trial by the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9198-207. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.907. Epub 2005 Sep 19. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16172458 Clinical Trial.
-
MOPPEBVCAD chemotherapy with limited and conditioned radiotherapy in advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: 10-year results, late toxicity, and second tumors.Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15;12(2):529-35. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1707. Clin Cancer Res. 2006. PMID: 16428496 Clinical Trial.
-
Can MOPP be replaced in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease?Semin Oncol. 1990 Feb;17(1 Suppl 2):2-6. Semin Oncol. 1990. PMID: 1689509 Review.
-
Long-Term Results of the HD2000 Trial Comparing ABVD Versus BEACOPP Versus COPP-EBV-CAD in Untreated Patients With Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Study by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;34(11):1175-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.4817. Epub 2015 Dec 28. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26712220 Clinical Trial.
-
What is the treatment of choice for advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: ABVD, Stanford V, or BEACOPP?Curr Hematol Rep. 2004 Jan;3(1):17-26. Curr Hematol Rep. 2004. PMID: 14695845 Review.
Cited by
-
Radiotherapy for patients with stage IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a propensity-matched analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.Cancer Biol Ther. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):832-840. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1796194. Epub 2020 Aug 23. Cancer Biol Ther. 2020. PMID: 32835569 Free PMC article.
-
The Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma International Prognostic Index: Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model From the HoLISTIC Consortium.J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 10;41(11):2076-2086. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02473. Epub 2022 Dec 10. J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36495588 Free PMC article.
-
Checkpoint Inhibitors in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.World J Oncol. 2021 Aug;12(4):81-84. doi: 10.14740/wjon1388. Epub 2021 Jul 10. World J Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34349851 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Survival of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC) versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) at a single institution.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 May;69(5):e29601. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29601. Epub 2022 Feb 21. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35187850 Free PMC article.
-
SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma.Clin Transl Oncol. 2015 Dec;17(12):1005-13. doi: 10.1007/s12094-015-1429-1. Epub 2015 Oct 26. Clin Transl Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26497354 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous