Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:975678.
doi: 10.4061/2011/975678. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

Illegal passive smoking at work

Affiliations

Illegal passive smoking at work

François-Xavier Lesage et al. Adv Prev Med. 2011.

Abstract

Introduction. Exposure to passive smoking at work has been forbidden for few years in France. This study's aim is to estimate the prevalence of passive smoking at work (PSW), the characteristics of illegal passive smoking and to identify eventual respiratory effects. Methods. Occupational practitioners (OPs) of a French county of 320,000 wage earners were contacted by mail. Then OP answered questions from a standardized questionnaire. These questions concerned the practised job, exposure features linked to PSW and health effects in relationship with second-hand smoke in workplace, and the focus on nonsmoker encountered by OP during the most recent occupational medical examination. Results. Ninety-five percent of a total group of 172 OP of Champagne county filled the postal questionnaire. More than 80% of OP's replies identified illegal PSW. The average prevalence of PSW exposure was 0.7% of the total working population. Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) levels were considered between low and medium for most passive smokers (71%). Main features exposure to ETS at work for non-smokers was associated with female gender (69.5%), age between 40 and 49 years (41.2%) and belonging to tertiary sector (75.6%). Environmental tobacco smoke exposures at work was firstly in the office for 49.7% of the subjects and secondly in the restroom for 18% of them. Main medical symptoms encountered by non-smokers were respiratory tractus irritation (81.7%). Eighty-three percent of OPs indicated solution to eradicate PSW. Illegal PSW is really weaker than fifteen years ago. However, the findings support a real ban on smoking in the workplace in order to protect all workers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kauppinen T, Toikkanen J, Pedersen D, et al. Occupational exposure to carcinogens in the European Union. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2000;57(1):10–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borland R, Pierce JP, Burns DM, Gilpin E, Johnson M, Bal D. Protection from environmental tobacco smoke in California: the case for a smoke-free workplace. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992;268(6):749–752. - PubMed
    1. Parrott S, Godfrey C, Raw M. Costs of employee smoking in the workplace in Scotland. Tobacco Control. 2000;9(2):187–192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woodward A. Is passive smoking in the workplace hazardous to health? Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 1991;17(5):293–301. - PubMed
    1. Tech. Rep. EPA/600:690/006 F. Washington, DC, USA: US Environmental Protection Agency; 1992. US. Environmental Protection Agency Respiratory Health effects of Passive Smoking : Lug cancer and other disorders.

LinkOut - more resources