Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:617672.
doi: 10.5402/2011/617672. Epub 2011 Jul 11.

Effect of the polishing procedures on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins

Affiliations

Effect of the polishing procedures on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins

Vera Lucia Schmitt et al. ISRN Dent. 2011.

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the polishing procedures effect on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins. Methods. Specimens were distributed into 6 groups: G1: Filtek Supreme XT + PoGo; G2: Filtek Supreme XT + Sof-Lex; G3: Filtek Supreme XT + no polishing; G4: Amelogen + PoGo; G5: Amelogen + Sof-Lex.; G6: Amelogen + no polishing. Initial color values were evaluated using the CIELab scale. After polishing, surface roughness was evaluated and the specimens were stored in coffee solution at 37°C for 7 days. The final color measurement and roughness were determined. Results. Sof-Lex resulted in lower staining. Amelogen showed the highest roughness values than Filtek Supreme on baseline and final evaluations regardless of the polishing technique. Filtek Supreme polished with PoGo showed the lowest roughness values. All groups presented discoloration after storage in coffee solution, regardless of the polishing technique. Conclusion. Multiple-step polishing technique provided lower degree of discoloration for both composite resins. The final surface texture is material and technique dependent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average and standard deviation values concerning Delta E regarding composite resins (Filtek Supreme (FS) and Amelogen (AM), polishing procedures and coffee storage time (baseline and 7-days storage)). Different small letters mean statistically significant difference between resin composites (P > 0.05); different capital letters mean statistically significant difference between polishing procedures (P > 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average values between baseline and final evaluation of surface roughness concerning polishing procedures and composite resins. Different small letters mean statistically significant difference between resin composites (P > 0.05); different capital letters mean statistically significant difference between polishing procedures (P > 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yap AUJ, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Operative Dentistry. 1997;22(6):260–265. - PubMed
    1. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dental Materials. 1997;13(4):258–269. - PubMed
    1. Hörsted-Bindslev P, Mjör IA. Modern Concepts in Operative Dentistry. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1988. Esthetic restoration; pp. 190–246.
    1. Buchalla W, Attin T, Hilgers RD, Hellwig E. The effect of water storage and light exposure on the color and translucency of a hybrid and a microfilled composite. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;87(3):264–270. - PubMed
    1. 22. Vita Easyshade Operating Manual Date of Issue: 05-05 Bad Säckingen, Germany.