Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):895-907.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.069. Epub 2011 Oct 4.

Multi-modal multi-task learning for joint prediction of multiple regression and classification variables in Alzheimer's disease

Affiliations

Multi-modal multi-task learning for joint prediction of multiple regression and classification variables in Alzheimer's disease

Daoqiang Zhang et al. Neuroimage. .

Erratum in

  • Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):2179

Abstract

Many machine learning and pattern classification methods have been applied to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its prodromal stage, i.e., mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Recently, rather than predicting categorical variables as in classification, several pattern regression methods have also been used to estimate continuous clinical variables from brain images. However, most existing regression methods focus on estimating multiple clinical variables separately and thus cannot utilize the intrinsic useful correlation information among different clinical variables. On the other hand, in those regression methods, only a single modality of data (usually only the structural MRI) is often used, without considering the complementary information that can be provided by different modalities. In this paper, we propose a general methodology, namely multi-modal multi-task (M3T) learning, to jointly predict multiple variables from multi-modal data. Here, the variables include not only the clinical variables used for regression but also the categorical variable used for classification, with different tasks corresponding to prediction of different variables. Specifically, our method contains two key components, i.e., (1) a multi-task feature selection which selects the common subset of relevant features for multiple variables from each modality, and (2) a multi-modal support vector machine which fuses the above-selected features from all modalities to predict multiple (regression and classification) variables. To validate our method, we perform two sets of experiments on ADNI baseline MRI, FDG-PET, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) data from 45 AD patients, 91 MCI patients, and 50 healthy controls (HC). In the first set of experiments, we estimate two clinical variables such as Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), as well as one categorical variable (with value of 'AD', 'MCI' or 'HC'), from the baseline MRI, FDG-PET, and CSF data. In the second set of experiments, we predict the 2-year changes of MMSE and ADAS-Cog scores and also the conversion of MCI to AD from the baseline MRI, FDG-PET, and CSF data. The results on both sets of experiments demonstrate that our proposed M3T learning scheme can achieve better performance on both regression and classification tasks than the conventional learning methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of the four different learning frameworks
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of the proposed M3T method
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scatter plots of the estimated MMSE scores vs. the actual scores by five different methods
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Scatter plots of the estimated ADAS-Cog scores vs. the actual scores by five different methods
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of performances of four different methods on Experiment 1
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
ROC curves of five different methods: MRI-based, PET-based, CSF-based, CONCAT, and M3T methods, for classification between MCI-C and MCI-NC
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparison of performances of four different methods on Experiment 2
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Top 25% brain regions with the highest correlation with class label, MMSE, and ADAS-Cog on Experiment 1
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Top 25% brain regions with the highest correlation with class label, MMSE change, and ADAS-Cog change on Experiment 2

References

    1. Apostolova LG, Hwang KS, Andrawis JP, Green AE, Babakchanian S, Morra JH, Cummings JL, Toga AW, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM, Jack CR, Jr, Petersen RC, Aisen PS, Jagust WJ, Koeppe RA, Mathis CA, Weiner MW, Thompson PM. 3D PIB and CSF biomarker associations with hippocampal atrophy in ADNI subjects. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31:1284–1303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Argyriou A, Evgeniou T, Pontil M. Convex multi-task feature learning. Machine Learning. 2008;73:243–272.
    1. Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007;38:95–113. - PubMed
    1. Bi J, Xiong T, Yu S, Dundar M, Rao B. An improved multi-task learning approach with applications in medical diagnosis; Proceedings of the 2008 European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases; 2008. pp. 117–132.
    1. Bouwman FH, Schoonenboom SN, van der Flier WM, van Elk EJ, Kok A, Barkhof F, Blankenstein MA, Scheltens P. CSF biomarkers and medial temporal lobe atrophy predict dementia in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2007a;28:1070–1074. - PubMed

Publication types