Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 May;27(5):2051-8.
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr546. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

Effect of self-administered intraperitoneal bemiparin on peritoneal transport and ultrafiltration capacity in peritoneal dialysis patients with membrane dysfunction. A randomized, multi-centre open clinical trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of self-administered intraperitoneal bemiparin on peritoneal transport and ultrafiltration capacity in peritoneal dialysis patients with membrane dysfunction. A randomized, multi-centre open clinical trial

Gloria Del Peso et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: Progressive peritoneal membrane injury and dysfunction are feared repercussions of peritoneal dialysis (PD), and may compromise the long-term feasibility of this therapy. Different strategies have been attempted to prevent or reverse this complication with limited success.

Methods: We performed a randomized, open multi-centre trial, aimed at scrutinizing the efficacy of self-administered intraperitoneal (i.p.) bemiparin (BM) to modulate peritoneal membrane dysfunction. The main outcome variables were peritoneal creatinine transport and the ultrafiltration (UF) capacity, estimated during consecutive peritoneal equilibration tests. The trial included a control group who did not undergo intervention. The treatment phase lasted 16 weeks with a post-study follow-up of 8 weeks.

Results: Intraperitoneal BM did not significantly improve creatinine transport or the UF capacity, when the whole group was considered. However, we observed a time-limited improvement in the UF capacity for the subgroup of patients with overt UF failure, which was not observed in the control group. Intraperitoneal injection of BM did not carry an increased risk of peritoneal infection or major haemorrhagic complications.

Conclusions: Our data do not support the systematic use of BM for management of peritoneal membrane dysfunction in PD patients. Further studies on the usefulness of this approach in patients with overt UF failure are warranted. Intraperitoneal administration of BM is safe in PD patients, provided regulated procedures are respected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms