Which interventions against the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce smoking?
- PMID: 21994275
- DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050145
Which interventions against the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce smoking?
Abstract
Objective: Signatories of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control have committed themselves to prohibiting the sale of tobacco to minors. The tobacco industry has a long history of legal challenges to such restrictions claiming that they cannot be expected to reduce youth smoking. The object of this study was to determine if disrupting the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce tobacco use by youths.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies that evaluated the impact on youth tobacco use of efforts to disrupt the sale of tobacco to youths.
Results: There was little evidence that merely enacting a law without sufficient enforcement had any impact on youth tobacco use. There was no evidence that merchant education programmes had any impact on youth older than 12 years of age. There was no evidence that enforcement efforts that failed to reduce the sale of tobacco to minors had any beneficial impact. All enforcement programmes that disrupted the sale of tobacco to minors reduced smoking among youth.
Conclusions: Government officials can expect that enforcement programmes that disrupt the sale of tobacco to minors will reduce adolescent smoking.
Similar articles
-
[Prohibition of tobacco sales to minors in France and Quebec. Comparison of legislative frameworks, their enforcement, and underage smoking].Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2019 May;67(3):181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Apr 4. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2019. PMID: 30954324 French.
-
Examining the perspectives of Texas minors cited for possession of tobacco.Health Promot Pract. 2006 Apr;7(2):197-205. doi: 10.1177/1524839905278852. Health Promot Pract. 2006. PMID: 16585142
-
Tobacco compliance check in Hong Kong.Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Feb;10(2):337-40. doi: 10.1080/14622200701824992. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008. PMID: 18236298
-
Youth access to tobacco.Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1 Suppl 2:S93-7. doi: 10.1080/14622299050011881. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999. PMID: 11768192 Review.
-
How can a ban on tobacco sales to minors be effective in changing smoking behaviour among youth? - A realist review.Prev Med. 2018 Oct;115:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 23. Prev Med. 2018. PMID: 30144483 Review.
Cited by
-
Retailers' Compliance with Federal Age of Cigarette Sales Policies -- Pitt County, North Carolina, January-March 2022.N C Med J. 2024;85(3):49-53. doi: 10.18043/001c.117074. Epub 2024 May 7. N C Med J. 2024. PMID: 38932935 Free PMC article.
-
The kids aren't alright: The effects of medical marijuana market size on adolescents.J Health Econ. 2023 Jan;87:102700. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102700. Epub 2022 Nov 11. J Health Econ. 2023. PMID: 36455395 Free PMC article.
-
Compliance Checks Decrease Cigarette Sales Rates to Pseudo-Underaged Mystery Shoppers: A Quasi-Experimental Control Group Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;19(20):13161. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013161. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36293737 Free PMC article.
-
Youth daily exposure to tobacco outlets and cigarette smoking behaviors: does exposure within activity space matter?Addiction. 2020 Sep;115(9):1728-1735. doi: 10.1111/add.15001. Epub 2020 Mar 7. Addiction. 2020. PMID: 32032445 Free PMC article.
-
Raising the Tobacco Sales Age to 21: Surveying the Legal Landscape.Public Health Rep. 2016 Mar-Apr;131(2):378-81. doi: 10.1177/003335491613100223. Public Health Rep. 2016. PMID: 26957675 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical