Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Jul;28(7):1541-4.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1541-1544.1990.

Evaluation of Syva enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of Syva enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens

C A Gaydos et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul.

Abstract

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection was evaluated by culture and a new Syva enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in 1,012 patients at two Baltimore, Md., sexually transmitted disease clinics. The overall chlamydia prevalence determined by culture was 12%. For 506 fresh cervical and urethral specimens, the sensitivity of Syva EIA was 90% and its specificity was 94% compared with culture. Discordant Syva EIA results were further evaluated by staining the sediment in centrifuged culture transport media and Syva EIA transport tubes with a fluorescent monoclonal antibody to C. trachomatis to detect elementary bodies. Reanalysis of the data after use of this technique to resolve discordant results increased sensitivity and specificity to 92 and 96%, respectively. A subsample of 307 fresh cervical specimens was also tested in a three-way comparison using Abbott Chlamydiazyme, Syva EIA, and culture. In this sample, compared with culture, the sensitivity and specificity of Syva EIA were 87 and 95%, respectively, and for Chlamydiazyme they were 77 and 98%, respectively. Syva EIA is a 4-h, easy-to-perform enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay which has a high sensitivity with fresh genital specimens and offers an excellent alternative to culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jan 18;300(3):123-5 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Med. 1981;32:45-61 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1981 Jul 23;305(4):195-200 - PubMed
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jul-Aug;5(4):713-9 - PubMed
    1. Epidemiol Rev. 1983;5:96-123 - PubMed

Publication types