Similar articles

• Comments on 'Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties'.

  McEntegart DJ. McEntegart DJ. Stat Med. 2008 Jun 30;27(14):2735-6. doi: 10.1002/sim.3179. Stat Med. 2008. PMID: 18069733 No abstract available.
• The impact of selection bias on test decisions in randomized clinical trials.

  Kennes LN, Cramer E, Hilgers RD, Heussen N. Kennes LN, et al. Stat Med. 2011 Sep 20;30(21):2573-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.4279. Epub 2011 Jun 30. Stat Med. 2011. PMID: 21717489
• Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trials.

  Ivanova A, Barrier RC Jr, Berger VW. Ivanova A, et al. Stat Med. 2005 May 30;24(10):1537-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.2058. Stat Med. 2005. PMID: 15723426
• Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.

  Teerenstra S, Melis RJ, Peer PG, Borm GF. Teerenstra S, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;59(4):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.003. Epub 2006 Feb 14. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16549260 Review.
• Review of 39 years of randomized controlled trials in the British Journal of General Practice.

  Silagy CA, Jewell D. Silagy CA, et al. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Aug;44(385):359-63. Br J Gen Pract. 1994. PMID: 8068395 Free PMC article. Review.