Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Nov 15;204 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S1168-78.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir449.

Diagnosing latent tuberculosis in high-risk individuals: rising to the challenge in high-burden areas

Affiliations
Review

Diagnosing latent tuberculosis in high-risk individuals: rising to the challenge in high-burden areas

Victoria O Kasprowicz et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

A key challenge to greater progress in tuberculosis (TB) control is the reservoir of latent TB infection (LTBI), which represents a huge long-lived reservoir of potential TB disease. In parts of Africa, as many as 50% of 15-year-olds and 77%-89% of adults have evidence of LTBI. A second key challenge to TB control is the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated TB epidemic, and Africa alone accounts for one-quarter of the global burden of HIV-associated TB. HIV co-infection promotes both reactivation TB from LTBI and rapidly progressive primary TB following recent exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Preventing active TB and tackling latent infection in addition to the Directly Observed Treatment, Short-Course (DOTS) strategy could improve TB control in high-burden settings, especially where there is a high prevalence of HIV co-infection. Current strategies include intensified case finding (ICF), TB infection control, antiretroviral therapy (ART), and isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT). Although ART has been widely rolled out, ICF and IPT have not. A key factor limiting the rollout and effectiveness of IPT and ICF is the limitations of existing tools to both diagnose LTBI and identify those persons most at risk of progressing to active TB. In this review, we examine the obstacles and consider current progress toward the development of new tools to address this pressing global problem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
What does the future hold? New approaches and next-generation interferon γ (IFN- γ) release assays (IGRAs). Two main strategies are available to improve on current IGRAs: the first involves the measurement of additional cytokine levels, and the second involves the incorporation of additional antigens [93]. The latter has already been shown to increase test sensitivity (without compromising specificity) when Rv2645 (TB7.7) was added to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay platform to create QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube [97, 101] and when RV3879c was added to the enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) platform to create ELISPOTPLUS [102]. Further research into the diagnostic utility of additional antigens is required, including that of heparin-binding hemagglutinin (HBHA) [–110]. The other strategy to improve IGRAs has also been investigated, and Ruhwald et al [111] have reported that measuring IFN-γ inducible protein 10 (IP-10) levels in addition to IFN-γ levels significantly improved diagnostic sensitivity for active tuberculosis (ATB) by 4% over QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test alone (while only slightly decreasing specificity from 100% to 98%; P < .009). The simultaneous measurement of interleukin 2 (IL-2) levels has also raised hopes for improving on IGRAs, because IFN- γ and IL-2 T-cell cytokine secretion profiles have been shown to correlate with pathogen load and the successful response to tuberculosis treatment [–114]. Ultimately, all of these novel approaches urgently need to be validated in large prospective studies to quantify their clinical utility and evaluate their prognostic power in both low- and high-burden settings. IL-8, interleukin 8; IL-12p40, interleukin 12p40; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection.

References

    1. United Nations. The Millenium development goals report. New York, NY: United Nations; 2008. 2008. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/. Accessed 1 September 2011.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Global tuberculosis control: a short update to the 2009 report. Geneva: WHO; 2009. http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/2009/update/tbu_9.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2010.
    1. Lonnroth K, Jaramillo E, Williams BG, Dye C, Raviglione M. Drivers of tuberculosis epidemics: the role of risk factors and social determinants. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:2240–6. - PubMed
    1. Watt CJ, Hosseini SM, Lonnroth K, Williams BG, Dye C. The global epidemiology of tuberculosis. In: Schaaf HS, Zumla IA, editors. Tuberculosis—a comprehensive clinical reference. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009.
    1. Dye C, Scheele S, Dolin P, Pathania V, Raviglione MC. Consensus statement: global burden of tuberculosis: estimated incidence, prevalence, and mortality by country. WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring Project. JAMA. 1999;282:677–86. - PubMed

Publication types