Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Mar;69(5):763-81.
doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0846-8. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany

Affiliations
Review

Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany

M Peiser et al. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Contact allergies are complex diseases, and one of the important challenges for public health and immunology. The German 'Federal Institute for Risk Assessment' hosted an 'International Workshop on Contact Dermatitis'. The scope of the workshop was to discuss new discoveries and developments in the field of contact dermatitis. This included the epidemiology and molecular biology of contact allergy, as well as the development of new in vitro methods. Furthermore, it considered regulatory aspects aiming to reduce exposure to contact sensitisers. An estimated 15-20% of the general population suffers from contact allergy. Workplace exposure, age, sex, use of consumer products and genetic predispositions were identified as the most important risk factors. Research highlights included: advances in understanding of immune responses to contact sensitisers, the importance of autoxidation or enzyme-mediated oxidation for the activation of chemicals, the mechanisms through which hapten-protein conjugates are formed and the development of novel in vitro strategies for the identification of skin-sensitising chemicals. Dendritic cell cultures and structure-activity relationships are being developed to identify potential contact allergens. However, the local lymph node assay (LLNA) presently remains the validated method of choice for hazard identification and characterisation. At the workshop the use of the LLNA for regulatory purposes and for quantitative risk assessment was also discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Allergic contact dermatitis in the European Union, incidence and preventive measures
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lymphocyte-mediated immune mechanisms in contact allergy. Sensitisation phase (a). The contact allergen activates dendritic cells in the skin via ‘pattern recognition receptors’ such as TLRs. Subsequently naïve T helper (Th) cells are polarised upon specific recognition of the haptenated allergen by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), costimulatory signals and cytokines such as IL-12, IL-4, IL-1β and IL-6. Elicitation phase (b). Hapten-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes (CTLs) release inflammatory cytokines and induce disease-specific local skin lesions following re-exposure of the skin to the same contact allergen
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Use of the LLNA for the regulatory risk assessment of potential allergens. The 5th percentile of the EC3 is similar to a probabilistic BMDL. Alternatively the respective data might be used to estimate a threshold concentration, similar to a ‘lowest adverse effect level’ (LOAEL)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nguyen SH, Dang TP, MacPherson C, Maibach H, Maibach HI. Prevalence of patch test results from 1970 to 2002 in a multi-centre population in North America (NACDG) Contact Dermat. 2008;58(2):101–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01281.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohl L, Blondeel A, Song M. Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics. Retrospective analysis of 819 patch-tested patients. Dermatology. 2002;204(4):334–337. doi: 10.1159/000063379. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lunder T, Kansky A. Increase in contact allergy to fragrances: patch-test results 1989–1998. Contact Dermat. 2000;43(2):107–109. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043002107.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menné T, Johansen JD. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermat. 2007;57(5):287–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01220.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations: the Odense adolescence cohort study on atopic diseases and dermatitis (TOACS) Acta Derm Venereol. 2002;82(5):352–358. doi: 10.1080/000155502320624087. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms