Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;57(10):e390-7.

Implementation of electronic medical records: theory-informed qualitative study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Implementation of electronic medical records: theory-informed qualitative study

Michelle Greiver et al. Can Fam Physician. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To apply the diffusion-of-innovations theory to the examination of factors that are perceived by family physicians as influencing the implementation of electronic medical records (EMRs).

Design: Qualitative study with 2 focus groups 18 months after EMR implementation; participants also took part in a concurrent quantitative study examining EMR implementation and preventive services.

Setting: Toronto, Ont.

Participants: Twelve community-based family physicians.

Methods: We employed a semistructured interview guide. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim; 2 researchers independently categorized and coded the transcripts and then met to compare and contrast their findings, category mapping, and interpretations. Findings were then mapped to an existing theoretical framework.

Main findings: Multiple barriers to EMR implementation were described. These included lack of relative advantage for many processes, high complexity of the system, low compatibility with physician needs and past experiences, difficulty with adaptation of the EMR to the organization and adaptation of the organization to the EMR, and lack of organizational slack. Positive factors were the presence of a champion and relative advantages for some processes.

Conclusion: Early EMR implementation experience is consistent with theoretical concepts associated with implementation of innovations. A problematic implementation process helps to explain, at least in part, the lack of improvement in preventive services in our quantitative results.

Objectif: Appliquer la théorie de la diffusion des innovations à l’examen des facteurs qui, selon les médecins de famille, influencent l’introduction des dossiers médicaux électroniques (DMÉ).

Type d’étude: Étude qualitative à l’aide de 2 groupes de discussion, 18 mois après la mise en œuvre des DMÉ; les participants participaient en même temps à une étude quantitative sur les rapports entre l’introduction des DMÉ et les activités préventives.

Lieu de l’étude: Toronto, Ontario.

Participants: Douze médecins de famille de la communauté

Méthodes: On a utilisé un guide d’entrevue semi-structurée. Les entrevues ont été enregistrées sur ruban magnétique et transcrites mot à mot; 2 chercheurs ont, chacun de leur côté, codé et classé par catégories les transcrits, pour ensuite comparer et confronter leurs observations, leur classement en catégories et leurs interprétations. Leurs observations ont été ensuite appliquées à un cadre théorique existant.

Principales observations: On a décrit plusieurs obstacles à l’introduction des DMÉ, dont le manque d’avantages relatifs pour plusieurs processus, la grande complexité du système, le peu de compatibilité avec les besoins et les expériences antérieures des médecins, la difficulté d’adapter le DMR à l’organisation et d’adapter l’organisation aux DMÉ, et l’absence de flexibilité de l’organisation. Les facteurs positifs étaient la présence d’un champion et des avantages relatifs pour certains processus.

Conclusion: Les premières données sur l’introduction des DMÉ sont compatibles avec les concepts théoriques associés à la mise en œuvre d’innovations. Un processus de mise en place problématique peut expliquer, au moins en partie, le peu d’amélioration des services préventifs qu’indiquent nos résultats quantitatifs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Theoretical factors affecting implementation of an innovation: A) Innovation attributes that positively (+), negatively (−), or inconclusively (0) affect implementation; B) Organizational attributes that positively (+) or inconclusively (0) affect implementation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(22):2218–27. - PubMed
    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–38. - PubMed
    1. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Steen N, Parkin D, Purves I, McColl E, et al. The design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate computerized decision support in primary care: the COGENT study. Fam Pract. 2000;17(2):180–6. - PubMed
    1. O’Connor PJ, Crain AL, Rush WA, Sperl-Hillen JM, Gutenkauf JJ, Duncan JE. Impact of an electronic medical record on diabetes quality of care. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(4):300–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou L, Soran CS, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Orav EJ, Bates DW, et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(4):457–64. Epub 2009 Apr 23. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources