Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;6(10):e25736.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025736. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

The establishment of genetically engineered canola populations in the U.S

Affiliations

The establishment of genetically engineered canola populations in the U.S

Meredith G Schafer et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Abstract

Concerns regarding the commercial release of genetically engineered (GE) crops include naturalization, introgression to sexually compatible relatives and the transfer of beneficial traits to native and weedy species through hybridization. To date there have been few documented reports of escape leading some researchers to question the environmental risks of biotech products. In this study we conducted a systematic roadside survey of canola (Brassica napus) populations growing outside of cultivation in North Dakota, USA, the dominant canola growing region in the U.S. We document the presence of two escaped, transgenic genotypes, as well as non-GE canola, and provide evidence of novel combinations of transgenic forms in the wild. Our results demonstrate that feral populations are large and widespread. Moreover, flowering times of escaped populations, as well as the fertile condition of the majority of collections suggest that these populations are established and persistent outside of cultivation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution and density of feral canola populations in North Dakota road surveys (2010).
Circles indicate locations of sampling sites; diameter of circle indicates plant density; gray circles indicate no canola present. The presence of genetically engineered protein in the vouchered specimen is shown by color: red – glyphosate resistance; blue – glufosinate resistance; yellow – dual resistance traits; green – non-transgenic. Canola fields are indicated by stippling based on 2009 USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service report (http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/index.php?sector=CROPS). Stars show the locations of oilseed processing plants (3). Solid lines illustrate interstate, state and county highways.

References

    1. Corvalan C, Hales S, McMichael A. Ecosystems and human well-being: health synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. 64
    1. Rieger MA, Lamond M, Preston C, Powles SB, Roush RT. Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science. 2002;296:2386–2388. - PubMed
    1. Beckie HJ, Warwick SI, Nair H, Seguin-Swartz G. Gene flow in commercial fields of herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Ecol Appl. 2003;13:1276–1294.
    1. Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR. The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science. 2000;290:2088–2093. - PubMed
    1. Lu B-R, Snow AA. Gene flow genetically modified rice and its environmental consequences. BioScience. 2005;55:669–678.

Publication types

MeSH terms