Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011;6(10):e25771.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025771. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

Influence of uranium on bacterial communities: a comparison of natural uranium-rich soils with controls

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Influence of uranium on bacterial communities: a comparison of natural uranium-rich soils with controls

Laure Mondani et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of uranium on the indigenous bacterial community structure in natural soils with high uranium content. Radioactive soil samples exhibiting 0.26% - 25.5% U in mass were analyzed and compared with nearby control soils containing trace uranium. EXAFS and XRD analyses of soils revealed the presence of U(VI) and uranium-phosphate mineral phases, identified as sabugalite and meta-autunite. A comparative analysis of bacterial community fingerprints using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) revealed the presence of a complex population in both control and uranium-rich samples. However, bacterial communities inhabiting uraniferous soils exhibited specific fingerprints that were remarkably stable over time, in contrast to populations from nearby control samples. Representatives of Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, and seven others phyla were detected in DGGE bands specific to uraniferous samples. In particular, sequences related to iron-reducing bacteria such as Geobacter and Geothrix were identified concomitantly with iron-oxidizing species such as Gallionella and Sideroxydans. All together, our results demonstrate that uranium exerts a permanent high pressure on soil bacterial communities and suggest the existence of a uranium redox cycle mediated by bacteria in the soil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Location of the study sites Vénachat and Villard and the different sampling points.
C: control samples. U: uranium-rich samples. Sampling years are labelled as: -06 (2006); -07 (2007); and -09 (2009).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scanning Electron Micrographs coupled with Energy Dispersive X-ray spectra analysis of Villard ViU-09 soil particles.
For each SEM image, the corresponding EDXS map for uranium (U) and phosphate (P) is presented. (A) soil particles. (B) soil particles and cell-shaped objects. (C) cell-shaped object.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Uranium speciation in soils.
(A) Uranium LIII-edge XAS spectra, normalized to equal intensity at 17.176 keV. (B) k3-weighted EXAFS curves for Vénachat and Villard soils, and for yellow particles extracted from Villard soil. All spectra are compared to reference. The m-autunite spectrum was from .
Figure 4
Figure 4. Principal Component Analysis of DGGE profiles from Vénachat soil samples.
Individual sample projections are shown on the first two axes of the analysis. The first axis (PC1) and the second axis (PC2) account for 45.5% and 15% of the variability, respectively. C corresponds to control samples, whereas U, U1 and U2 correspond to uranium-rich samples. 06 and 07 indicate the years 2006 and 2007. a,b,c correspond to replicates, and p signifies pooled DNA.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Principal Component Analysis of DGGE profiles from Villard soil samples.
(A) Individual sample projections on the first two axes of the analysis. The first axis (PC1) and the second axis (PC2) account for 41.1% and 23.8% of the variability, respectively. (B) Individual DGGE band projections on the first two axes. Band_5 position (masked by band_38) is indicated with an arrow. C corresponds to control samples, whereas U corresponds to uranium-rich samples. 06, 07 and 09 indicate the years 2006, 2007 and 2009 respectively. a,b,c correspond to replicates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lovley DR, Phillips EJP, Gorby YA, Landa ER. Microbial reduction of uranium. Nature. 1991;350:413–416.
    1. Lovley DR, Phillips EJ. Reduction of uranium by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58:850–856. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Francis AJ, Dodge CJ, Lu F, Halada GP, Clayton CR. XPS and XANES Studies of Uranium Reduction by Clostridium sp. Environ Sci Technol. 1994;28:636–639. - PubMed
    1. Wall JD, Krumholz LR. Uranium reduction. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:149–166. - PubMed
    1. Beller HR. Anaerobic, nitrate-dependent oxidation of U(IV) oxide minerals by the chemolithoautotrophic bacterium Thiobacillus denitrificans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2170–2174. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources