Vasectomy: an appraisal for the obstetrician-gynecologist
- PMID: 2199876
Vasectomy: an appraisal for the obstetrician-gynecologist
Abstract
Data regarding the efficacy of vasectomy are limited, but the procedure appears to be highly effective. Efficacy may vary by the method of vas occlusion. Death attributable to vasectomy in the United States is exceedingly rare, and major perioperative morbidity is quite uncommon. No long-term adverse health effects have been documented, and much evidence supports the conclusion that vasectomy does not increase the risk of subsequent atherosclerosis. Vasectomy, like tubal sterilization, should be considered a permanent decision, because reversal surgery is expensive and requires substantial surgical expertise. Although vasectomy reversal is often successful, it cannot be guaranteed even in the best of circumstances, and when the vasectomy has caused epididymal obstruction, reversal is often unsuccessful. Vasectomy represents a safe and effective alternative to tubal sterilization for couples who decide that the male should be sterilized.
Similar articles
-
Sterilization.Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):603-40. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984. PMID: 6239731 Review.
-
Sterilization.Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):189-203. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000298621.98372.62. Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18165410 Review.
-
The choice of sterilization procedure among married couples.J Fam Pract. 1982 Jan;14(1):27-30. J Fam Pract. 1982. PMID: 7054368
-
Vasectomy and its reversal.Prim Care. 1985 Dec;12(4):703-17. Prim Care. 1985. PMID: 3853238
-
Male sterilization.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;2(4):535-40. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1990. PMID: 2130950 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical