Non-interventional study to investigate the efficacy and safety of Tegaderm™ Matrix in the treatment of patients with therapy-refractory chronic wounds
- PMID: 21999577
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07828.x
Non-interventional study to investigate the efficacy and safety of Tegaderm™ Matrix in the treatment of patients with therapy-refractory chronic wounds
Abstract
Background: Despite a variety of therapeutic approaches, many patients with chronic wounds remain refractory to treatment. Products such as Tegaderm™ Matrix were developed especially for such patients to alter the wound environment and reactivate the stagnant wound healing process.
Patients and methods: In this prospective post-authorization observational product study, a total of 314 patients with therapy-refractory chronic wounds of various origins were evaluated. Beside to the wound area reduction and healing rate, the occurrence of adverse events was documented.
Results: On average the wounds were 10 months old. The average wound size was 17.3 cm(2) (median 6.3 cm(2)) at the initial visit. In the course of treatment the wound size decreased to 13.0 cm(2) (median 3.5 cm(2)) and was finally reduced to 9.3 cm(2) (median 0.9 cm(2)) at end of the study. Taking the criteria of the European Wound Management Association for improving the quality of clinical studies into consideration, a wound size reduction of at least 50% is the parameter for successful treatment of chronic wounds. This study demonstrated a wound size reduction of at least 50% for 72.9% of the patients with therapy-refractory chronic wounds when treated with Tegaderm™ Matrix. The safety profile was evaluated; only 4.7% of the patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event such as a burning sensation.
Conclusions: The results of the study demonstrate that Tegaderm™ Matrix along with treatment of underlying causes is a well tolerated wound dressing promoting wound size reduction up to healing for the majority of patients with previously therapy-refractory chronic wounds.
© The Authors • Journal compilation © Blackwell Verlag GmbH, Berlin.
Comment in
-
[Modern wound dressings].J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012 Jun;10(6):383-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2012.07955.x. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012. PMID: 22779082 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Use of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of neonatal and pediatric wounds: a retrospective examination of clinical outcomes.Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007 Jun;53(6):75-85. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007. PMID: 17586874
-
A pilot study to evaluate the safety and clinical performance of Leucopatch, an autologous, additive-free, platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of recalcitrant chronic wounds.Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2011 Dec;10(4):218-23. doi: 10.1177/1534734611426755. Epub 2011 Oct 18. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2011. PMID: 22009148
-
Shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: a feasibility study.J Surg Res. 2007 Nov;143(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Sep 27. J Surg Res. 2007. PMID: 17904157 Clinical Trial.
-
Noncontact low-frequency ultrasound therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds: a meta-analysis.Wound Repair Regen. 2011 Jul-Aug;19(4):475-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00701.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7. Wound Repair Regen. 2011. PMID: 21649783 Review.
-
Revolutionary advances in the management of traumatic wounds in the emergency department during the last 40 years: part II.J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.11.016. Epub 2009 Mar 9. J Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 19272735 Review.
Cited by
-
Wound pH-Modulating Strategies for Diabetic Wound Healing.Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep;13(9):446-462. doi: 10.1089/wound.2023.0129. Epub 2024 Feb 14. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2024. PMID: 38149883 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical