Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 1;5(5):375-379.
doi: 10.1517/17530059.2011.590129.

The Promise and the Problems of Epigenetics Biomarkers in Cancer

Affiliations

The Promise and the Problems of Epigenetics Biomarkers in Cancer

Attila T Lorincz. Expert Opin Med Diagn. .

Abstract

Epigenetics plays an important role in tissue differentiation and phenotypic changes are associated with extensive modifications in epigenetic patterns such as DNA methylation (DNAme), histone methylation and acetylation marks, and micro RNAs. From a diagnostic perspective, DNAme is one of the more tractable epigenetic changes; differentially affecting a large number of genes. Variations can be measured accurately, on any given set of CG sites, by sequencing bisulfite converted DNA. The promise of DNAme is that biomarkers can be found in every kind of gene from rare unstable cell-cycle enzymes to highly expressed structural proteins. Almost any kind of biological specimen is amenable and the changes can be measured in tissue biopsies, scrapes, aspirates, urine, blood and other fluids. To date, hundreds of differentially methylated genes have been identified in cancer that can potentially function as biomarkers. The most common kind of change, studied, is CpG island methylation of tumor suppressor genes that modifies transcription. Despite a great many candidates, few of the DNAme markers have been adequately validated for routine clinical use. Important current limitations of epigenetic biomarkers are that assays are diverse; gene lists are large; comparative data are few, and disagreements in published papers are frequent.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Li LC, Carroll PR, Dahiya R. Epigenetic changes in prostate cancer: Implication for diagnosis and treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:103–15. - PubMed
    2. * Overview of DNA methylation with an indication of the problems in reproducibility

    1. Baylin SB, Belinsky SA, Herman JG, et al. Aberrant methylation of gene promoters in cancer - concepts, misconcepts, and promise. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1460–61. - PubMed
    1. Cao R, Wang L, Wang H, et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science. 2002;98:1039–43. - PubMed
    1. Killian JK, Bilke S, Davis S, et al. Large-scale profiling of archival lymph nodes reveals pervasive remodeling of the follicular lymphoma methylome. Cancer Res. 2009;69:758–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sparano JA. TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx) Clin Breast Cancer. 2006;7:347–50. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources