Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Oct;93(7):528-31.
doi: 10.1308/147870811X13137608454939.

Surgeon-operated ultrasonography in a one-stop shoulder clinic

R Seagger  1 , T Bunker, P Hamer
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Surgeon-operated ultrasonography in a one-stop shoulder clinic

R Seagger et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Nearly 1 in 40 of the population seeks medical advice related to a shoulder problem every year. The majority pertain to rotator cuff pathology. Prior to intervention in such patients it is imperative to define whether the tendons are intact or torn. Ultrasonography has become an essential adjunct to clinical assessment in diagnosing rotator cuff tears. This study was designed to investigate if a surgeon using a portable ultrasonography machine in a one-stop shoulder clinic could significantly reduce the time a patient waited from initial outpatient presentation to the end of the treatment episode (be it surgery, injection or conservative management).

Methods: A total of 77 patients were allocated to one of two groups: Group A, consisting of 37 patients who were assessed and had ultrasonography as outpatients, and Group B, consisting of 40 patients who were assessed and referred for departmental ultrasonography where appropriate. Three clear outcome groups were defined: those who required surgical repair, those who had irreparable tears and those who declined surgery.

Results: For all outcomes (surgery, irreparable tears and conservative treatment), the patients in Group A all completed their clinical episodes significantly quicker than those in Group B (p<0.02). As well as the time saving benefits, there was a substantial financial saving for Group A. By performing ultrasonography in the outpatients department, those patients avoided the requirement of departmental imaging (£120) and subsequent follow-up appointments (£73) to discuss results and management, resulting in a saving of nearly £200 per patient.

Conclusions: The use of a portable ultrasonography machine by an orthopaedic surgeon can significantly reduce the time to treatment and the financial cost for patients with rotator cuff tears.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interval from initial outpatient review to endpoint for patients with an outcome of surgery
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interval from initial outpatient review to endpoint for patients with an outcome of irreparable tear
Figure 3
Figure 3
Interval from initial outpatient review to endpoint for patients with an outcome of conservative management
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Al-Shawi A, Badge R, Bunker T. The detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears using ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:889–892. - PubMed
    1. Crass JR, Craig EV, Thompson RC, Feinberg SB. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: surgical correlation. J Clin Ultrasound. 1984;12:487–491. - PubMed
    1. Iannotti JP, Ciccone J, Buss DD, et al. Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1,305–1,311. - PubMed
    1. Middleton WD, Edelstein G, Reinus WR, et al. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: technique and normal anatomy. J Ultrasound Med. 1984;3:549–551. - PubMed
    1. Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Yamaguchi K. Sonography of the rotator cuff: analysis of interobserver variability. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1,465–1,468. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms