Taking the energy out of spatio-temporal energy models of human motion processing: the Component Level Feature Model
- PMID: 22005388
- DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.014
Taking the energy out of spatio-temporal energy models of human motion processing: the Component Level Feature Model
Abstract
Standard biologically inspired spatio-temporal energy models of how humans perceive moving two-dimensional patterns often have two critical stages. In the first stage, suitable filters are convolved with the pattern over time to extract information at the "component" level. Motion energy is then computed for each component. The second stage typically computes pattern velocity using the intersection of constraints rule (IOC). This paper describes a new implementation of the Component Level Feature Model (Bowns, 2002) that computes motion direction that is similar to these two stages except that it does not compute motion energy. Here the model computes direction for 200 randomly generated plaids. The output linearly matched that predicted by the IOC. The model was also able to predict the perceived direction even when it deviated from the IOC due to the following variables - speed ratio (Bowns, 1996); duration (Yo & Wilson, 1992); adaptation (Bowns & Alais, 2006). The model provides a novel explanation for each of the above and for why multiple directions can be represented for the same stimuli (Bowns & Alais, 2006); and why some second-order information attributed to non-linearities (Derrington, Badcock, & Holroyd, 1992) reverses perceived motion direction. Finally, CLFM is invariant to contrast and phase.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
An explanation of why component contrast affects perceived pattern motion.Vision Res. 2013 Jun 28;86:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Apr 3. Vision Res. 2013. PMID: 23562389
-
Perceived direction of plaid motion is not predicted by component speeds.Vision Res. 2007 Feb;47(3):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.017. Epub 2006 Dec 21. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17187840
-
Can spatio-temporal energy models of motion predict feature motion?Vision Res. 2002 Jun;42(13):1671-81. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00081-0. Vision Res. 2002. PMID: 12079795
-
Evidence for a feature tracking explanation of why type II plaids move in the vector sum direction at short durations.Vision Res. 1996 Nov;36(22):3685-94. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00082-x. Vision Res. 1996. PMID: 8976998
-
IOC, vector sum, and squaring: three different motion effects or one?Vision Res. 2001 Mar;41(7):965-72. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00289-3. Vision Res. 2001. PMID: 11248281
Cited by
-
A Model of Motion Processing in the Visual Cortex Using Neural Field With Asymmetric Hebbian Learning.Front Neurosci. 2019 Feb 12;13:67. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00067. eCollection 2019. Front Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 30809113 Free PMC article.
-
A Motion-from-Form Mechanism Contributes to Extracting Pattern Motion from Plaids.J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 6;36(14):3903-18. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3398-15.2016. J Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27053199 Free PMC article.
-
Motion-based prediction is sufficient to solve the aperture problem.Neural Comput. 2012 Oct;24(10):2726-50. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00332. Epub 2012 Jun 26. Neural Comput. 2012. PMID: 22734489 Free PMC article.
-
Without low spatial frequencies, high resolution vision would be detrimental to motion perception.J Vis. 2020 Aug 3;20(8):29. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.8.29. J Vis. 2020. PMID: 32857109 Free PMC article.
-
The role of the harmonic vector average in motion integration.Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Oct 21;7:146. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00146. eCollection 2013. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 24155716 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources