Retention of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified GIC versus composite resin adhesives--a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials
- PMID: 22006128
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0626-8
Retention of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified GIC versus composite resin adhesives--a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to establish whether the clinical debonding (failure) rates of orthodontic brackets bonded either with resin-modified glass ionomer (RM-GIC) or with composite resin adhesive are the same. Five databases were searched for articles up to 18 November 2010. Inclusion criteria were titles/abstracts relevant to the review question and two or more arm clinical trial. Exclusion criteria were the following: no computable data recorded and subjects of both groups not followed up in the same way. From the accepted trials, datasets were analysed concerning clinical precision and internal validity. Eleven trials were accepted. From these, 15 dichotomous datasets were extracted. Relative risk with 95% confidence interval of nine datasets showed no statistically significant differences in outcome between the treatment and control group after 6 months-1.32 years. Five showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), favouring resin composite bonding after 12 and 18 months. One favoured RM-GIC after 10 months. Meta-analysis found no difference in the failure rate between the two treatment groups after 12 months (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.87-1.42; p = 0.40) and found in favour of composite resin adhesive after >14 months (RR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.60-3.17; p < 0.00001). All trials had poor internal validity due to selection and detection/performance bias risk. The current evidence suggests no difference between the types of materials after 12 months but favours composite resin adhesives after a >14-month period. However, its risk of selection and detection/performance bias are high, and all results need to be regarded with caution. Further high quality randomised control trials addressing this topic are needed. The clinical relevance of this study is that RM-GIC may have the same clinical debonding (failure) rate as composite resin adhesives after 1 year when used for bonding of orthodontic brackets.
Comment in
-
Bonding failure is similar if brackets are bonded either with resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM-GICs) or composite resin cements (CRCs).J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012 Dec;12(4):193-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.09.010. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012. PMID: 23177495 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):CD008072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008072.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29284075 Free PMC article.
-
Adhesives for bonded molar tubes during fixed brace treatment.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):CD008236. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008236.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28230910 Free PMC article.
-
Demineralization of hard tooth tissue adjacent to resin-modified glass-ionomers and composite resins: a quantitative systematic review.J Oral Sci. 2010 Sep;52(3):347-57. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.52.347. J Oral Sci. 2010. PMID: 20881326
-
Caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) versus composite resin: a quantitative systematic review.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011 Feb;12(1):5-14. doi: 10.1007/BF03262772. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011. PMID: 21299939
-
Adhesives for bonded molar tubes during fixed brace treatment.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15;(6):CD008236. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008236.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2:CD008236. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008236.pub3. PMID: 21678375 Updated.
Cited by
-
Cytotoxicity of V-Prep Versus Phosphoric Acid Etchant on Oral Gingival Fibroblasts.J Funct Biomater. 2022 Nov 28;13(4):266. doi: 10.3390/jfb13040266. J Funct Biomater. 2022. PMID: 36547526 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical bracket failure rates between different bonding techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2023 Mar 31;45(2):175-185. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac050. Eur J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 36222731 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of glass ionomer cements composed of glass powders in CaO-SrO-ZnO-SiO₂ system prepared by two different synthetic routes.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013 Dec;24(12):2677-82. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-5017-z. Epub 2013 Aug 7. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013. PMID: 23918526
-
Shear bond strength of a RMGIC for orthodontic bracket bonding to enamel.BDJ Open. 2024 Jan 2;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41405-023-00181-5. BDJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38167700 Free PMC article.
-
Shear Bond Strength of Molar Tubes to Enamel Using an Orthodontic Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Amorphous Calcium Phosphate.Front Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;16(5):369-378. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i5.2286. Epub 2019 Oct 15. Front Dent. 2019. PMID: 32123877 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources