Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jan;470(1):299-306.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2131-4. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing

Affiliations
Comparative Study

2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing

Katherine M Bedigrew et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Surface replacement arthroplasties are commonly performed in young, active patients who desire return to high-impact activities including heavy manual labor and recreational sports. Femoral neck fracture is an arthroplasty-related complication unique to surface replacement arthroplasty. However, it is unclear regarding whether patients are at lower risk for fracture after a certain postoperative time.

Questions/purposes: We therefore raised the following questions: (1) does stress shielding occur after surface replacement arthroplasty, and (2) when does bone mineral density return to normal so patients can return to high-impact activities without excessive risk of fracture?

Patients and methods: We prospectively enrolled 90 patients (96 hips) with either surface replacement arthroplasty or THA, and performed dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. We analyzed bone density by Gruen zone in both groups, and six femoral neck zones in the patients who had surface replacement arthroplasties. We calculated 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year ratios for the change in bone density compared with baseline.

Results: Bone density was greater in patients who had surface replacement arthroplasties than for patients who had THAs at 6 months and 1 year in Gruen Zones 1, 2, 6, and 7, with the largest increase in femoral neck bone density on the tension side at 6 months in Zone L1. We saw no decrease in bone density in patients who had surface replacement arthroplasties in any Gruen zone at any time, and observed no decrease in bone density in female patients.

Conclusions: Increased bone density at 6 months postoperatively in patients who had surface replacement arthroplasties provides evidence that clinically relevant stress shielding does not occur after surface replacement arthroplasty. Owing to the increased bone mineral density at 6 months, we believe patients who underwent surface replacement arthroplasties may to return to high-impact activities at that time without increased risk of fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1A–B
Fig. 1A–B
The radiographs show (A) the seven Gruen zones in a patient undergoing THA, and (B) the Gruen zone template that was superimposed on the image from a patient undergoing surface replacement arthroplasty to allow comparison to the seven Gruen zones in a THA.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
This radiograph shows the six regions of interest in the femoral neck; L1-L3 are lateral and M1-M3 are medial to the femoral neck stem.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:28–39. - PubMed
    1. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1874–1877. - PubMed
    1. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P, Dorey FJ. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci. 1998;3:169–186. doi: 10.1007/s007760050038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amstutz HC, Duff MJ. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6 suppl 1):36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amstutz HC, Wisk LE, Duff MJ. Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.033. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms