Association between selected risk factors and the incidence of venous obstruction after pacemaker implantation: demographic and clinical factors
- PMID: 22006604
Association between selected risk factors and the incidence of venous obstruction after pacemaker implantation: demographic and clinical factors
Abstract
Background: Venous obstruction and subsequent pulmonary embolism belong to the most common and dangerous complications of pacemaker implantation. Thus, identification of patients at risk of venous obstruction seems to be of critical importance.
Aim: To determine risk factors of venous obstruction following pacemaker implantation.
Methods: Eighty one patients with permanent cardiac pacing (31 F, 50 M; mean age 71.1 ± 7.6 years) were included. Prior to pacemaker implantation, the following factors were evaluated in each patient: indications for pacemaker implantation, heart failure severity assessed using the NYHA classification, coexisting diseases, a history of tobacco smoking, medications used before the procedure (antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, antibiotics), a history of thrombotic or infectious complications, and previous temporary cardiac pacing. Type of venous access and procedure time were also assessed. Venous ultrasound examination to evaluate veins in both upper extremities, shoulder areas and the neck was performed before pacemaker implantation and 6 and 12 months following the procedure. Computed tomography and conventional digital subtraction angiography were performed to confirm the diagnosis of venous obstruction.
Results: The patients were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of venous obstruction after pacemaker implantation. Group I (n = 71, 29 F, 42 M; mean age 71.0 ± 7.7 years) included patients without venous obstruction, and group II (n = 10, 2 F, 8 M; mean age 71.6 ± 7.0 years) included patients diagnosed with venous obstruction. Each patient was followed for 19 months. In group II (12.3% of the study population), venous obstruction developed mean 13 months after pacemaker implantation. In this group, symptomatic venous obstruction was observed in 3 patients (3.7% of the study population), mean 15 months after pacemaker implantation. Risk factors for venous obstruction included a history of myocardial infarction, temporary cardiac pacing, arrhythmia, venous anomalies, NYHA class III and IV heart failure, a history of infection, and tobacco smoking. Depending on the number of risk factors, the probability of development of venous obstruction was described by the following equation: e(-14.6 + 3.19x)/1 + e(-14.6 + 3.19x), where x is the number of risk factors. In patients who had more than 6 risk factors, almost a 100% probability of the occurrence of venous obstruction was observed.
Conclusions: 1. Risk factors for venous obstruction include a history of myocardial infarction, temporary cardiac pacing, arrhythmia, venous anomalies, infections, NYHA class III and IV heart failure, and tobacco smoking. 2. In patients who had more than 6 risk factors, almost a 100% risk of venous obstruction was observed.
Comment in
-
[Comment to article Elektrodopochodna niedrożność żylna - liczne manifestacje i następstwa].Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(10):1041-2. Kardiol Pol. 2011. PMID: 22006605 Polish. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of selected prothrombotic and proinflammatory factors on the incidence of venous thrombosis after pacemaker implantation.Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(3):260-7. Kardiol Pol. 2012. PMID: 22430407
-
Predictors of venous obstruction following pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a contrast venographic study on 100 patients admitted for generator change, lead revision, or device upgrade.Europace. 2007 May;9(5):328-32. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum019. Epub 2007 Mar 16. Europace. 2007. PMID: 17369270
-
[Venous thrombosis as a complication of pacemaker implantation--own observations].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2011 Feb;30(176):102-10. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2011. PMID: 21544979 Polish.
-
Postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: what is the incidence and are there any predicting factors?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Feb;12(2):243-53. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.256578. Epub 2010 Nov 23. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21098508 Review.
-
Venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;13(1):9-19. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-1140-1. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15976973 Review.
Cited by
-
A Comprehensive Review of Catheter-Related Thrombosis.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 21;13(24):7818. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247818. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39768741 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Venoplasty of a chronic venous occlusion with 'diathermy' for cardiac device lead placement.Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019 Jan-Feb;19(1):27-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019. PMID: 30367925 Free PMC article.
-
Recurrent Transient Ischemic Attacks in a Patient with Multiple Pacemaker Leads.J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2023 Apr 15;14(4):5424-5430. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2023.14042. eCollection 2023 Apr. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2023. PMID: 37143573 Free PMC article.
-
Permanent pacing in patients without upper limb venous access: a review of current techniques.Heart Asia. 2014 Nov 27;6(1):163-6. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2014-010546. eCollection 2014. Heart Asia. 2014. PMID: 27326197 Free PMC article.
-
Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis and Asymptomatic Vein Occlusion in Patients With Transvenous Leads: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Aug 18;8:698336. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.698336. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34490367 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical