Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:671659.
doi: 10.1155/2011/671659. Epub 2011 Oct 9.

Novel jumbo biopsy forceps for surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease: a comparative retrospective assessment

Affiliations

Novel jumbo biopsy forceps for surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease: a comparative retrospective assessment

Kenneth Song et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2011.

Abstract

Background and Study Aims. Most available jumbo cup forceps require a 3.7 mm biopsy channel, necessitating the use of standard-sized colonoscope. A newer jumbo forceps (Radial Jaw 4 Jumbo Biopsy Forceps [RJ4]) fits within a 3.2 mm biopsy channel, allowing use with a pediatric colonoscope. To assure the RJ4 did not alter biopsy adequacy, we compared the size and quality of specimens to a historical jumbo cup forceps (Radial Jaw 3 Max Capacity Biopsy Forceps, [RJ3 MC]). Patients and Methods. A retrospective comparative study of biopsies taken with either forceps. Biopsies were compared for diameter, depth, crush artifact, and acceptability for diagnosis. Results. 333 specimens were taken with RJ4 and 335 specimens with the RJ3 MC. Mean sample diameter was 4.45 mm and 4.55 mm for the RJ4 and RJ3 MC (P = 0.41). Mean depth of biopsies with the RJ4 was greater (P < 0.01). Conclusions. Biopsies from the RJ4 are similar in size and quality to biopsies from the RJ3 MC. The RJ4 has the advantage of fitting in a smaller biopsy channel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
RJ4 (left) and standard large diameter forceps (right). Both are straight shaft forceps with a cup design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of mean biopsy diameter for specimens taken with the RJ4 forceps and standard large diameter forceps. There was no significant difference in diameter of specimens obtained with the two forceps (P = 0.41).

References

    1. Levine DS, Haggitt RC, Blount PL, Rabinovitch PS, Rusch VW, Reid BJ. An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1993;105(1):40–50. - PubMed
    1. Ekbom A, Helmick C, Zack M, Adami HO. Ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer: a population-based study. New England Journal of Medicine. 1990;323(18):1228–1233. - PubMed
    1. Gillen CD, Walmsley RS, Prior P, Andrews HA, Allan RN. Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: a comparison of the colorectal cancer risk in extensive colitis. Gut. 1994;35(11):1590–1592. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Itzkowitz SH, Present DH, Binder V, et al. Consensus conference: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2005;11(3):314–321. - PubMed
    1. Bat L, Williams CB. Usefulness of pediatric colonoscopes in adult colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1989;35(4):329–332. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources