Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:107176.
doi: 10.1155/2011/107176. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

The effect of pulling out cochlear implant electrodes on inner ear microstructures: a temporal bone study

Affiliations

The effect of pulling out cochlear implant electrodes on inner ear microstructures: a temporal bone study

Ingo Todt et al. Int J Otolaryngol. 2011.

Abstract

The exchange of an cochlear implant or the re-positioning of an electrode have become more frequently required than a decade ago. The consequences of such procedures at a microstructural level within the cochlea are not known. It was the aim of the present study to further investigate the effects of an CI electrode pull-out. Therefore 10 freshly harvested temporal bones (TB) were histologically evaluated after a cochlear implant electrode pull-out of a perimodiolar electrode. In additional 9 TB the intrascalar movements of the CI electrode while being pulled-out were digitally analysed by video- capturing. Histologically, a disruption of the modiolar wall or the spiral osseous lamina were not observed. In one TB, a basilar membrane lifting up was found, but it could not be undoubtedly attributed to the pull-out of the electrode. When analyzing the temporal sequence of the electrode movement during the pull-out, the electrode turned in one case so that the tip elevates the basilar membrane. The pull- out of perimodiolarly placed CI electrodes does not damage the modiolar wall at a microstructural level and should be guided (e.g., forceps) to prevent a 90 o turning of the electrode tip into the direction of the basilar membrane.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scalaer overview. No sign of pull-out-related lesion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
BM lifting. Bubble formation with tissue shearing under the BM as a sign of BM lifting.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Exemplaric regular modiolar wall.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cochlea with preperated basilar membrane before pull-out. CI array positioned under the BM.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cochlea with preperated basilar membrane while pulling out. Regional reflex change of the basilar membrane with the array tip underneath as sign of a BM elevation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eshraghi AA, Yang NW, Balkany TJ. Comparative study of cochlear damage with three perimodiolar electrode designs. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(3):415–419. - PubMed
    1. Wardrop P, Whinney D, Rebscher SJ, Roland JT, Jr., Luxford W, Leake PA. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour™ electrodes. Hearing Research. 2005;203(1-2):54–67. - PubMed
    1. Wardrop P, Whinney D, Rebscher SJ, Luxford W, Leake P. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: comparison of Spiral Clarion™ and HiFocus II™ electrodes. Hearing Research. 2005;203(1-2):68–79. - PubMed
    1. Klenzner T, Richter B, Nagursky H, Schipper J, Laszig R, Aschendorff A. Evaluation of the inserfion-trauma of the Nucleus® Contour Advance™ electrode-array in a human temporal bone model. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 2004;83(12):840–844. - PubMed
    1. Wright CG, Roland PS, Kuzma J. Advanced bionics thin lateral and helix II electrodes: a temporal bone study. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(11):2041–2045. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources