Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program
- PMID: 22007229
- PMCID: PMC3189617
- DOI: 10.1155/2011/683703
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program
Abstract
Study Objective. Prospectively compare outcomes of robotically assisted and laparoscopic hysterectomy in the process of implementing a new robotic program. Design. Prospectively comparative observational nonrandomized study. Design Classification. II-1. Setting. Tertiary caregiver university hospital. Patients. Data collected consecutively 24 months, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, 25 patients underwent robotic hysterectomy, and 11 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy at our institution. Interventions. Outcomes of robotically assisted, laparoscopic, and vaginal complex hysterectomies performed by a single surgeon for noncancerous indications. Measurements and Main Results. Operative times were 208.3 ± 59.01 minutes for laparoscopic, 286.2 ± 82.87 minutes for robotic, and 163.5 ± 61.89 minutes for vaginal (P < .0001). Estimated blood loss for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was 242.7 ± 211.37 cc, 137.4 ± 107.50 cc for robotic surgery, and 243.2 ± 127.52 cc for vaginal surgery (P = 0.05). The mean length of stay ranged from 1.8 to 2.3 days for the 3 methods. Association was significant for uterine weight (P = 0.0043) among surgery methods. Conclusion. Robotically assisted hysterectomy is feasible with low morbidity, a shorter hospital stay, and less blood loss. This suggests that robotic assistance facilitates a minimally invasive approach for patients with larger uterine size even during implementing a new robotic program.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18439499
-
An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):295-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0388-6. Epub 2013 Feb 27. J Robot Surg. 2013. PMID: 27000926
-
Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 23423414
-
Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Robotic-Assisted, and Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy for Uterine and Cervical Cancers: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;14(24):2782. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242782. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39767143 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):710-720. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 5. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33348012
Cited by
-
Economic impact of blood transfusions: balancing cost and benefits.Eurasian J Med. 2014 Feb;46(1):47-9. doi: 10.5152/eajm.2014.08. Eurasian J Med. 2014. PMID: 25610294 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analysis of postoperative pain in robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.J Robot Surg. 2014 Mar;8(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0418-z. Epub 2013 Jul 3. J Robot Surg. 2014. PMID: 27637237
-
Uterine fibroids and current clinical challenges.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013 Mar 1;14(1):40-5. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.09. eCollection 2013. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013. PMID: 24592069 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of residents' previous laparoscopic surgery experience on initial robotic suturing experience.ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:569456. doi: 10.5402/2012/569456. Epub 2012 Sep 2. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22973522 Free PMC article.
-
A financial analysis of operating room charges for robot-assisted gynaecologic surgery: Efficiency strategies in the operating room for reducing the costs.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2014 Mar 1;15(1):25-9. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.jtgga.2014.79989. eCollection 2014. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2014. PMID: 24790513 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Falcone T, Walters MD. Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;111(3):753–767. - PubMed
-
- Keshavarz H, Hillis SD, Kieke BA, Marchbanks PA. Hysterectomy Surveillance—United States, 1994–1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2002;51(SS05):1–8. - PubMed
-
- Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, Everett EN, Shah C, Peters WA. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;198(6):679.e1–679.e10. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources