Prognostic parameters for the primary care of melanoma patients: what is really risky in melanoma?
- PMID: 22007305
- PMCID: PMC3191731
- DOI: 10.1155/2011/521947
Prognostic parameters for the primary care of melanoma patients: what is really risky in melanoma?
Abstract
Due to intensified research in recent years, the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the development of melanoma has dramatically improved. The discovery of specific, causal mutations such as BRAF or KIT oncogenes not only renders a targeted and thus more effective therapeutic approach possible, but also gives rise to a new genetic-based classification. Targeting just a few out of several potential mutations, BRAF-Inhibitors such as PLX 4032 achieved already tremendous results in the therapy of metastatic melanoma. Up to now, the correlation of clinical, histomorphologic, and genetic features is, however, not understood. Even more, is it not well known precisely what kind of molecular changes predispose the primary melanoma for metastasis. The identification of morphological surrogates and prognostic parameters in tumors with such genetic alteration seems therefore crucial when differentiating and classifying this heterogeneous tumor entity in more detail and thus facilitates the stratification of prognosis as well as therapy. This review summarizes the current understanding of carcinogenesis and gives a detailed overview of known morphologic and potentially future genetic prognostic parameters in malignant melanoma.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Conjunctival malignant melanoma in Denmark: epidemiology, treatment and prognosis with special emphasis on tumorigenesis and genetic profile.Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 May;94 Thesis 1:1-27. doi: 10.1111/aos.13100. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27192168
-
Genetic progression of malignant melanoma.Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016 Mar;35(1):93-107. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9613-5. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016. PMID: 26970965 Review.
-
[Malignant Melanoma - from Classical Histology towards Molecular Genetic Testing].Klin Onkol. 2017 Summer;30(3):182-189. doi: 10.14735/amko2017182. Klin Onkol. 2017. PMID: 28612614 Review. Czech.
-
The Prognostic Value of BRAF, C-KIT, and NRAS Mutations in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Aug 1;98(5):1069-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Mar 29. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017. PMID: 28721890 Free PMC article.
-
MAPK Pathway and TERT Promoter Gene Mutation Pattern and Its Prognostic Value in Melanoma Patients: A Retrospective Study of 2,793 Cases.Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 15;23(20):6120-6127. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0980. Epub 2017 Jul 18. Clin Cancer Res. 2017. PMID: 28720667
Cited by
-
[Translational research and diagnostics of melanoma].Pathologe. 2012 Nov;33 Suppl 2:291-5. doi: 10.1007/s00292-012-1661-1. Pathologe. 2012. PMID: 22968732 Review. German.
-
Coexistence of TERT promoter and BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma is associated with more clinicopathological features of aggressiveness.Virchows Arch. 2015 Aug;467(2):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1784-x. Epub 2015 Jun 9. Virchows Arch. 2015. PMID: 26055532
-
Integrative genomics identifies gene signature associated with melanoma ulceration.PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054958. Epub 2013 Jan 30. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23383013 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Garbe C, Leiter U. Melanoma epidemiology and trends. Clinics in Dermatology. 2009;27(1):3–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials