Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Feb;1(1):74-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.2757-7861.2008.00013.x.

The clinical features of, and microendoscopic decompression for, extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve

Yue Zhou  1 , Wen-jie Zheng, Jian Wang, Tong-wei Chu, Chang-qing Li, Zheng-feng Zhang, Wei-dong Wang
Affiliations
Comparative Study

The clinical features of, and microendoscopic decompression for, extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve

Yue Zhou et al. Orthop Surg. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical results of, and surgical techniques for, microendoscopic (METRx) decompression of extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve at the lumbosacral tunnel.

Methods: Five patients with extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve in the lumbosacral tunnel were treated in our department, including three men and two women. The average age was 65.6 years. All patients suffered severe leg pain and neurological deficits compatible with L5 radiculopathy. Minimally invasive decompression of the L5 spinal nerve was performed under METRx intertransverse decompression.

Results: With an average follow-up of 17.8 months, clinical results were assessed based on Nakai criteria and Visual Analogue scale (VAS). All patients experienced immediate pain relief postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were excellent in three patients and good in two. The average intraoperative blood loss was 59 ml, with an average operative time of 103 min. Average post-operative stay in bed was 7 days, and average cost was $1860.

Conclusion: Extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve in the lumbosacral tunnel can cause L5 radiculopathy. METRx partial resection of the L5 transverse processes, sacral ala and osteophytes of L5-S1 vertebral bodies to relieve extraforaminal entrapment of the L5 spinal nerve is a very effective and minimally invasive surgical option.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A typical patient, male, 64 years old, complaining of low back pain and left leg pain, presenting weakness of extensor hallucis longus, and straight leg raising sign positive at 40°. (A, B) Osteophyte formation at posterior and inferior edge of L5 vertebra; (C) Removal of inferior part of L5 transverse process; (D) Partial removal of sacral ala using high speed burr to enlarge the L5‐S1 intertransverse space; (E) Retraction of intertransverse membrane by nerve retractor to expose L5 nerve root; (F) Removal of adjacent osteophyte by high speed burr; (G) Dissection and release of L5 nerve root by nerve dissector.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wiltse LL, Guyer RD, Spencer CW, et al. Alar transverse process impingement of the l5 spinal nerve: the far‐out syndrome. Spine, 1984, 9: 31 – 41. - PubMed
    1. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Nojiri K, et al. Extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve by osteophytes of the lumbosacral spine: anatomic study and a report of four cases. Spine, 2002, 27: E169 – E173. - PubMed
    1. Nakai O, Ookawa A, Yamaura I. Long‐term roentgenogrphic and functional changes in patients who were treated with wide fenestration for central lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1991, 73: 1184 – 1191. - PubMed
    1. Nathan H, Weizenbluth M, Halperin H. The lumbosacral ligament (LSL) with special emphasis on the ‘lumbosacral tunnel’ and the entrapment of the 5th lumbar nerve. Int Orthop, 1982, 6: 197 – 202. - PubMed
    1. Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, et al. Evidence from cadavers suggestive of entrapment of fifth lumbar spinal nerves by lumbosacral ligaments. Spine, 1991, 16: 336 – 347. - PubMed

Publication types