Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;3(1):45-51.
doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2010.00113.x.

Surgical treatment of open pilon fractures

Affiliations

Surgical treatment of open pilon fractures

Xian-tie Zeng et al. Orthop Surg. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the methods, timing and clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for open pilon fractures.

Methods: From April 2003 to July 2008, 28 patients with open pilon fractures were treated. All had type C fractures according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für osteosynthesefragen-Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) classification. Three operative methods were applied, the methods being determined by the types of fracture, soft tissue damage and time interval after injury. Seven cases were treated by debridement and internal fixation with plate; 19 by limited internal fixation combined with external fixation; and 2 by delayed surgery. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Burwell-Charnley score.

Results: All cases were followed up for from 6 to 48 months (average 24 months). The Burwell-Charnley score of clinical outcomes: anatomic reduction achieved in 12 cases, functional reduction in 15, and unsatisfactory reduction in 1. The healing time was from 2.5 to 11 months (average 4.7 months). Two cases had delayed union. According to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale for the ankle joint, there were excellent results in 8 cases, good in 14, fair in 5 and poor in 1. Complications included four cases of skin superficial sloughing, two of superficial infection, one of deep infection, two of delayed fracture union and ten of post-traumatic arthritis.

Conclusion: It is important to perform appropriate surgeries for open pilon fracture according to fracture classification, different damage to skin and tissue and time interval after injury. Thorough debridement, proper use of anti-infective medication, appropriate bone grafting, and postoperative ankle function exercise can reduce the occurrence of complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 49 year‐old man with a low‐energy open pilon fracture (Gustilo I & C1) (a) Photograph showing open soft tissue injury (Gustilo I). (b) Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs showing Pilon fracture of type C1. (c) Postoperative radiographs showing the fractures have been anatomically reduced and fixed with plates. (d) Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating fractures have healed 1 year after surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 22 year‐old man with a high‐energy open pilon fracture (Gustilo II & C2) (a) Photograph showing open soft tissue injury (Gustilo II). (b) Preoperative radiographs showing Pilon fracture of type C2. (c) Postoperative radiographs showing the fractures have been anatomically reduced and fixed with external fixation, and the tibial fracture fixed with limited internal fixation. (d) Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating the fractures have healed 1.5 year after surgery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A 37 year‐old man with a super high‐energy open pilon fracture (Gustilo IIIB &C3) (a) Photograph showing open soft tissue injury (Gustilo IIIB) (b) Preoperative radiographs showing Pilon fracture of type C3. (c) Postoperative radiographs showing the fractures have been anatomically reduced and fixed with external fixation, the tibial fixed with limited internal fixation, and the fibula with a plate. (d) Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating the fractures have healed 1.5 year after surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang YC. Fractures and Joint Injury, 4th edn. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2007; 1469.
    1. Zhang B, Huang L, Wang MY, et al Surgical treatment of tibial pilon fracture (Chin). Zhonghua Gu Ke Za Zhi, 2001, 21: 403–407.
    1. Craig S, Bartlett III, Lon S, et al Fracture of the tibial pilon In: Browner B, Jupiter J, Levine A, et al, eds. Skeletal Trauma, 3rd edn. Singapore: Elsevier, 2003; 2257.
    1. Zhang JG, Lin FS, Yin SB, et al The prognostic relative factors in treatment of tibial pilon fracture. Zhonghua Gu Ke Za Zhi, 2004, 24: 44–47.
    1. Lin MS, Lee HM, Hou YT, et al Treatment of tibial pilon fractures using the Link May Anatomic Bone Plate. J Chin Med Assoc, 2003, 66: 423–428. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms