Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 13;6(11):1695-709.
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.388.

Proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry

Affiliations

Proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry

Rita Casadonte et al. Nat Protoc. .

Abstract

Archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue collections represent a valuable informational resource for proteomic studies. Multiple FFPE core biopsies can be assembled in a single block to form tissue microarrays (TMAs). We describe a protocol for analyzing protein in FFPE-TMAs using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) imaging mass spectrometry (IMS). The workflow incorporates an antigen retrieval step following deparaffinization, in situ trypsin digestion, matrix application and then mass spectrometry signal acquisition. The direct analysis of FFPE-TMA tissue using IMS allows direct analysis of multiple tissue samples in a single experiment without extraction and purification of proteins. The advantages of high speed and throughput, easy sample handling and excellent reproducibility make this technology a favorable approach for the proteomic analysis of clinical research cohorts with large sample numbers. For example, TMA analysis of 300 FFPE cores would typically require 6 h of total time through data acquisition, not including data analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Workflow for investigation of peptide content in FFPE-TMA. Flowchart showing the procedure for in situ proteomics on FFPE-TMA samples by imaging mass spectrometry.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trypsin and matrix application. (a) Representative acoustic droplet ejection of picoliter volumes of reagent solution from the reagent source reservoir to a MALDI target plate holder. (b) TMA section scanned after 30 cycles of trypsin (top) and matrix (bottom), respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protein identification workflow. Representative workflow for protein identification by MS/MS. (a) Tissue section is microspotted with trypsin and matrix for MALDI MS/MS analysis. (b) The mass spectrum produced is acquired, and a parent ion of m/z 1,460.9 is selected for fragmentation. (c) Magnification of the parent ion peak at m/z 1,460.9 shown in panel b. The peak at m/z 1,460.9 is the monoisotopic peak for the intact protonated peptide. The three peaks at higher mass, each separated by 1 Da, result from incorporation of one or more of the less abundant isotopes into the molecule, with 13C at a natural abundance of 1.11% being the main contributor. (d) MS/MS spectrum of the 1,460.9 parent ion and analysis of the fragment ions produced. This figure is reproduced, with permission, from reference .
Figure 4
Figure 4
Portrait spotting setup. (a) Description of loading the source reagent reservoir of Portrait 630 instrument. Reagent solution, trypsin or matrix, is slowly pipetted into the source reservoir between the baffle and the reservoir wall. The source is filled with a volume ranging from 500 to 600 µl. (b) Target plate holder view for calibration and sample slide insertion. With the round corner at the holder on the right, place the calibration slide below the ITO slide. (c) Enlarged view of calibration patterns for ejector parameter and X/Y offset calibration, respectively. (d) Enlarged view of the TMA section after trypsin and matrix spotting.
Figure 5
Figure 5
IMS correlation with pathological diagnosis. (a–d) Representation of the statistical classification of four TMA cores correlating with the pathological diagnosis. Pathologist diagnosis is shown in panels a–d; four TMA cores have undergone H&E staining, and pathological analysis using light microscopy. Adenocarcinoma (a,c) and squamous cell carcinoma (b,d) were marked in each biopsy for the cancerous region (red line) and the noncancerous region (green line). (e–h) The marked cancer regions were then co-registered with serial TMA sections analyzed by MALDI IMS and ClinProTools for classification, enabling the spot position of each spectrum to be linked to that same precise histological region in the TMA. Adenocarcinoma is shown in red and squamous cell carcinoma in green. For the statistical classification, mass spectra from the cancer regions of each biopsy were first grouped to create an average spectrum representative of both the adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. The peaks present in these average spectra were compared through statistical analysis to identify a subset of peaks that were significantly different between each group to be used as the class identifiers. A support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was used to build a classification model. The SVM model was run against all spectra in the data set and the outcome of each classification was visualized using the class imaging function in FlexImaging software. This model classified two biopsies as squamous cell carcinoma (f,h, peptide images in green) and the other two biopsies as adenocarcinoma (e,g, peptide images in red), in agreement with the pathology diagnosis. This figure is reproduced, with permission, from reference .
Figure 6
Figure 6
MALDI images of three tryptic peptides originating from heat shock protein β-1 detected in two of three squamous cell carcinoma core biopsies analyzed in a TMA. This demonstrates the protein heterogeneity that can be measured in biopsies of the same nominal disease classification. This figure is reproduced, with permission, from reference .

References

    1. Metz B, et al. Identification of formaldehyde-induced modifications in proteins: Reactions with insulin. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006;17:815–822. - PubMed
    1. Rahimi F, Shepherd CE, Halliday GM, Geczy CL, Raftery MJ. Antigen-epitope retrieval to facilitate proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed archival brain tissue. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:7216–7221. - PubMed
    1. Werner M, Chott A, Fabiano A, Battifora H. Effect of formalin tissue fixation and processing on immunohistochemistry. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2000;24:1016–1019. - PubMed
    1. Shi SR, Key ME, Kalra KL. Antigen retrieval in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: an enhancement method for immunohistochemical staining based on microwave oven heating of tissue sections. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1991;39:741–748. - PubMed
    1. Groseclose MR, Massion PP, Chaurand P, Caprioli RM. Highthroughput proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue microarrays using MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Proteomics. 2008;8:3715–3724. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types