Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcome of induced labor at term using sequential intracervical Foley catheter with intravaginal misoprostol versus intravaginal misoprostol alone.

Methods: A prospective matched case control study among parturient with prolonged pregnancy and unfavorable cervix at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria.

Results: The study population was 100 with a mean age of 29.46 ± 3.88 years. Parturient with prior cervical priming using intracervical Foley catheter had significantly lower oxytocin augmentation of uterine contractions in labor (44 vs. 64%, P = 0.045), shorter mean insertion to active phase labor duration (233 ± 98 vs. 354 ± 154 min, P = 0.0001), shorter insertion to delivery interval (514 ± 175 vs. 627 ± 268, P = 0.014), more vaginal delivery <12 h (92.5 vs. 60%, P = 0.001) and less delivery by caesarean section (20 vs. 40%, P = 0.029).

Conclusions: The sequential combination of intracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor appears to be a safe and more effective method compared to intravaginal misoprostol in parturient at term with unfavorable cervices.