Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;51(11):962-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00117-011-2180-4.

[Magnetic resonance tomography-guided interventional procedure for diagnosis of prostate cancer]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Magnetic resonance tomography-guided interventional procedure for diagnosis of prostate cancer]

[Article in German]
M Schernthaner et al. Radiologe. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

In recent years magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly established in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in addition to transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). The use of T2-weighted imaging allows an exact delineation of the zonal anatomy of the prostate and its surrounding structures. Other MR imaging tools, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging or diffusion-weighted imaging allow an inference of the biochemical characteristics (multiparametric MRI). Prostate cancer, which could only be diagnosed using MR imaging or lesions suspected as being prostate cancer, which are localized in the anterior aspect of the prostate and were missed with repetitive TRUS biopsy, need to undergo MR guided biopsy. Recent studies have shown a good correlation between MR imaging and histopathology of specimens collected by MR-guided biopsy. Improved lesion targeting is therefore possible with MR-guided biopsy. So far data suggest that MR-guided biopsy of the prostate is a promising alternative diagnostic tool to TRUS-guided biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Mar;7(2):181-90 - PubMed
    1. Radiographics. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):677-703 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):162-72 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2007 Apr;17(4):1118-24 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2001 Jul;220(1):263-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources