Assessing potential radiological harm to fukushima recovery workers
- PMID: 22013394
- PMCID: PMC3186926
- DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.11-004.Scott
Assessing potential radiological harm to fukushima recovery workers
Abstract
A radiological emergency exists at the Fukushima Daiichi (Fukushima I) nuclear power plant in Japan as a result of the March 11, 2011 magnitude 9.0 earthquake and the massive tsunami that arrived later. News media misinformation related to the emergency triggered enormous social fear worldwide of the radioactivity that is being released from damaged fuel rods. The heroic recovery workers are a major concern because they are being exposed to mostly gamma radiation during their work shifts and life-threatening damage to the radiosensitive bone marrow could occur over time. This paper presents a way in which the bone marrow equivalent dose (in millisieverts), as estimated per work shift, could be used along with the hazard function model previously developed for radiological risk assessment to repeatedly check for potential life-threatening harm (hematopoietic system damage) to workers. Three categories of radiation hazard indication are proposed: 1, life-threatening damage unlikely; 2, life-threatening damage possible; 3, life-threatening damage likely. Categories 2 and 3 would be avoided if the whole body effective dose did not exceed the annual effective dose limit of 250 mSv. For down-wind populations, hormetic effects (activated natural protective processes) are much more likely than are deleterious effects.
Keywords: hormesis; radiological emergency; risk assessment.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Analysis of the Regionality of the Number of Tweets Related to the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Disaster: Content Analysis.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Dec 18;4(4):e70. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7496. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018. PMID: 30563815 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on background radiation doses measured by control dosimeters in Japan.Health Phys. 2012 May;102(5):535-41. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31824c9594. Health Phys. 2012. PMID: 22469931
-
250 mSv: temporary increase in the emergency exposure dose limit in response to the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident and its decision making process.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(4):D35-42. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2014.989366. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015. PMID: 25436995
-
Recent discussions toward regulatory implementation of the new occupational equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye and related studies in Japan.Int J Radiat Biol. 2019 Aug;95(8):1103-1112. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1605464. Epub 2019 Apr 26. Int J Radiat Biol. 2019. PMID: 30964367 Review.
-
The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident--an overview.Health Phys. 2012 Aug;103(2):169-74. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31825b57ec. Health Phys. 2012. PMID: 22951475 Review.
References
-
- Ainsworth EJ, Leong GF, Kendal K, Alpen EL, Albright ML. Biological Effects of Neutron and Proton Irradiation. II. IAEA; Vienna, Austria: 1964. Pulsed irradiation studies in mice, rats and dogs; pp. 15–30.
-
- AFRRI (Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute) Chemical Protection Against X-Ray, Gamma, and Neutron Radiation. Bethesda, MD: 1997. AFFRI Contract Report 97-1,
-
- Feinendegen LE, Neumann RD, Pollycove M. Systems-related facts and consequences in assessing risk from low-level irradiation. Health Phys. 2011;100(3):274–276. (extended abstract) - PubMed
-
- IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Medical Handling of Accidentally Exposed Individuals, Safety Series No. 88. IAEA; Viena, Austria: 1988.
-
- IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Generic Procedures for Medical Responses during a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Report EPR-Medical (2005) IAEA; Vienna, Austria: 2005.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources