Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 11:2:57.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2011.00057. eCollection 2011.

Valorising and creating access to innovative medicines in the European union

Affiliations

Valorising and creating access to innovative medicines in the European union

Lieven Annemans et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

This Perspective describes (a) the current situation, (b) challenges and initiatives, (c) and formulates recommendations to valorize and create access to innovative medicines in the EU. We are currently still far away from optimal assessment of value for money in the EU. On the one hand, valorizing innovative medicines involves a local appraisal by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and competent authorities about the value for money, the budget impact, and the local medical need that can be filled with new medicines. Therefore, local priorities and national health care policy environments should be reflected in the processes and criteria used for assessing value for money and ultimately for reimbursement decisions. On the other hand, a pan-European assessment of both relative effectiveness and medical need (including general ethical and social considerations) should be envisaged in order to feed part of the data needed for the local decisions in an efficient way. This could be the task of the European Medicines Agency, HTA bodies, and competent authorities together.

Keywords: access; budget impact; cost–effectiveness; health technology assessment; medical need; pharmaceutical innovation; relative effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carlson J. J., Garrison L. P., Sullivan S. D. (2009). Paying for outcomes: innovative coverage and reimbursement schemes for pharmaceuticals. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 15, 683–687 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cleemput I., Neyt M., Thiry N., De Laet C., Leys M. (2008). Threshold Values for Cost-Effectiveness in Health Care. Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre
    1. Clement F. M., Harris A., Li J. J., Yong K., Lee K. M., Manns B. J. (2009). Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada. JAMA 302, 1437–144310.1001/jama.2009.1409 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Docteur E., Paris V. (2008). Improving Health System Efficiency: Achieving Better Value for Money. Brussels: Joint European Commission/OECD Conference
    1. Dubois D. J. (2010). Grand challenges in pharmacoeconomics and health outcomes. Front. Pharmacol. 1:7.10.3389/fphar.2010.00007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources