Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:573968.
doi: 10.1155/2011/573968. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

New criteria of indication and selection of patients to cochlear implant

Affiliations

New criteria of indication and selection of patients to cochlear implant

André L L Sampaio et al. Int J Otolaryngol. 2011.

Abstract

Numerous changes continue to occur in cochlear implant candidacy. In general, these have been accompanied by concomitant and satisfactory changes in surgical techniques. Together, this has advanced the utility and safety of cochlear implantation. Most devices are now approved for use in patients with severe to profound unilateral hearing loss rather then the prior requirement of a bilateral profound loss. Furthermore, studies have begun utilizing short electrode arrays for shallow insertion in patients with considerable low-frequency residual hearing. This technique will allow the recipient to continue to use acoustically amplified hearing for the low frequencies simultaneously with a cochlear implant for the high frequencies. The advances in design of, and indications for, cochlear implants have been matched by improvements in surgical techniques and decrease in complications. The resulting improvements in safety and efficacy have further encouraged the use of these devices. This paper will review the new concepts in the candidacy of cochlear implant. Medline data base was used to search articles dealing with the following topics: cochlear implant in younger children, cochlear implant and hearing preservation, cochlear implant for unilateral deafness and tinnitus, genetic hearing loss and cochlear implant, bilateral cochlear implant, neuropathy and cochlear implant and neural plasticity, and the selection of patients for cochlear implant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eisenberg L, House W. Initial experience with the cochlear implant in children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology Supplement. 1982;91(2):67–73. - PubMed
    1. Arts HA, Garber A, Zwolan TA. Cochlear implants in young children. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2002;35(4):925–943. - PubMed
    1. Waltzman SB, Roland JT., Jr. Cochlear Implant Candidates in Cochlear Implants. New York, NY, USA: Thierme Medical Publishers; 2006.
    1. Cheng A, Grant G, Niparko J. Meta-analysis of pediatric cochlear implant literature. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 1999;108(4):124–128. - PubMed
    1. Kileny P, Zwolan T, Ashbaugh C. The influence of age at implantation on performance with a cochlear implant in children. Otology and Neurotology. 2001;22(1):42–46. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources