A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone
- PMID: 22014657
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.019
A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone
Abstract
Several techniques are described for fixation of Vancouver B1 femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty. Twenty-four femurs were scanned by dual x-ray absorptiometry scanned and matched for bone mineral density. Femurs were implanted with a cemented simulated total hip prosthesis with a simulated periprosthetic femur fracture distal to the stem. Fractures were fixed with Synthes (Paoli, Pa) 12-hole curved plates and 4 different constructs proximally. Each construct was loaded to failure in axial compression. Constructs with locking and nonlocking screws demonstrated equivalent loads at failure and were superior in load at failure compared with cables. Cable constructs failed proximally. No proximal failures occurred in specimens fixed with screws and cables. A combination of locked or nonlocked screws and supplemental cable fixation is recommended for the treatment of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates.J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Feb;20(2):89-93. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000199119.38359.96. J Orthop Trauma. 2006. PMID: 16462560
-
Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.Injury. 2014 Jul;45(7):1035-41. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 11. Injury. 2014. PMID: 24680467
-
A biomechanical study comparing cortical onlay allograft struts and plates in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2005 Jan;20(1):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.08.008. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2005. PMID: 15567539
-
Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: a review of biomechanical testing.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011 Jan;26(1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.002. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011. PMID: 20888674 Review.
-
Periprosthetic distal femur fractures: current concepts.J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Jun;25 Suppl 2:S82-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8a09. J Orthop Trauma. 2011. PMID: 21566481 Review.
Cited by
-
Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates.Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1749-55. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2787-6. Epub 2015 May 7. Int Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25947899
-
Periprosthetic bone loss: diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.F1000Res. 2014 Jun 17;2:266. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-266.v2. eCollection 2013. F1000Res. 2014. PMID: 25642325 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after femoral revision using a long stem.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 May 10;16:113. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0565-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015. PMID: 25958328 Free PMC article.
-
A Retrospective Study on the Incidence of Periprosthetic Fractures Related to Total Hip Arthroplasty and Postoperative Complications During Hospitalization.Clin Pract. 2025 Feb 21;15(3):42. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15030042. Clin Pract. 2025. PMID: 40136578 Free PMC article.
-
A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization-A Biomechanical Comparison.J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 8;11(3):892. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030892. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35160342 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous