Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1990 Jul;6(2):134-40.
doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(90)90088-d.

Differences in side effects between a conventional carbamazepine preparation and a slow-release preparation of carbamazepine

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Differences in side effects between a conventional carbamazepine preparation and a slow-release preparation of carbamazepine

L I Persson et al. Epilepsy Res. 1990 Jul.

Abstract

The aim of this double-blind cross-over study was to investigate whether side effects of carbamazepine (CBZ) could be reduced by using a slow-release CBZ preparation. Twenty-one adult patients with epilepsy who had side effects related to the use of CBZ took part in the trial. Patients were randomized to receive either a conventional (C) or slow-release (SR) CBZ preparation for 3 months and were then switched over to the other preparation for another 3 months. The daily dose and dosing frequency of CBZ were kept the same as before the study. The quality and severity of side effects were assessed monthly using a scored questionnaire containing questions about systemic toxicity (STRS) and neurotoxicity (NTRS). Twenty patients could be evaluated. The mean total values of NTRS of 3 monthly visits on each drug were significantly less during SR than during C treatment (P less than 0.05). All the items of NTRS scored lower during SR therapy, and the difference was significant for the occurrence of headache, dizziness and disturbances of vision, speech and coordination. The total score of STRS was also lower during SR, but the difference was not significant. Eleven patients preferred SR, 3 preferred C and 6 patients estimated the periods to be equal. In conclusion, a slow-release preparation of CBZ can render fewer side effects than conventional CBZ preparations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types