Platelet inhibition and GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy by intracoronary versus intravenous bolus administration of abciximab in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- PMID: 22015616
- DOI: 10.1007/s00392-011-0372-6
Platelet inhibition and GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy by intracoronary versus intravenous bolus administration of abciximab in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Abstract
Background: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), direct intracoronary bolus administration of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab is associated with a reduction in infarct size, better myocardial salvage, less microvascular obstruction and improved myocardial blush grade as compared to intravenous bolus injection, presumably caused by higher local drug concentrations leading to a more pronounced inhibition of platelet aggregation. We investigated whether there are differences in the degree of GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy and platelet inhibition in blood drawn from the coronary sinus (CS) shortly after intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab bolus administration.
Methods: A total of 16 patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 12 h of symptom onset underwent blood sampling from the CS before, immediately after and 30 min after abciximab bolus administration (intracoronary bolus: n = 8 patients; intravenous bolus: n = 8 patients).
Results: Immediately after bolus application, GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy in CS blood was significantly higher in patients who received direct intracoronary bolus injection compared to administration via a peripheral vein (intracoronary bolus: 93.5% [IQR 92.7-95.4]; intravenous bolus: 74.0% [IQR 17.6-94.0], p = 0.04). The degree of platelet inhibition was also markedly higher with intracoronary compared to intravenous dosing. At late sampling after 30 min no significant differences were found between groups for both platelet reactivity and GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy.
Conclusions: Acutely, direct intracoronary bolus injection resulted in a more pronounced local inhibition of platelet function and a higher degree of GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy as compared to standard intravenous bolus injection.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00712101.
Similar articles
-
Intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus abciximab application during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the Abciximab Intracoronary versus intravenously Drug Application in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (AIDA STEMI) trial.Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):547-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.038. Am Heart J. 2010. PMID: 20362711 Clinical Trial.
-
Intracoronary versus intravenous bolus abciximab application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: 6-month effects on infarct size and left ventricular function. The randomised Leipzig Immediate PercutaneouS Coronary Intervention Abciximab i.v. versus i.c. in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial (LIPSIAbciximab-STEMI).Clin Res Cardiol. 2011 May;100(5):425-32. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0260-5. Epub 2010 Dec 2. Clin Res Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21125288 Clinical Trial.
-
Intracoronary eptifibatide bolus administration during percutaneous coronary revascularization for acute coronary syndromes with evaluation of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy and platelet function: the Intracoronary Eptifibatide (ICE) Trial.Circulation. 2010 Feb 16;121(6):784-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.882746. Epub 2010 Feb 1. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 20124127 Clinical Trial.
-
Rationale for intracoronary administration of abciximab.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2007 Feb;23(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11239-006-9000-0. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2007. PMID: 17160551 Review.
-
Meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Am J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 1;109(5):624-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.016. Epub 2011 Dec 5. Am J Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22152971 Review.
Cited by
-
Is There Still a Role for Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Antagonists in Acute Coronary Syndromes?Cardiol Res. 2013 Feb;4(1):1-7. doi: 10.4021/cr251w. Epub 2013 Mar 8. Cardiol Res. 2013. PMID: 28348696 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmaco-mechanic antithrombotic strategies to reperfusion of the infarct-related artery in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarctions.J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013 Jun;6(3):378-87. doi: 10.1007/s12265-013-9448-1. Epub 2013 Feb 14. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013. PMID: 23408112 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e58077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058077. Epub 2013 Feb 28. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23469144 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of hemostasis in patients with end-stage renal disease.PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212237. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30785941 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Will intravenous paracetamol crush fentanyl in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI?Neth Heart J. 2019 Apr;27(4):169-170. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-1262-1. Neth Heart J. 2019. PMID: 30847664 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical