Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995-2008
- PMID: 22015878
- PMCID: PMC3202294
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182318651
Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995-2008
Abstract
Objective: To estimate trends and risk factors for cesarean delivery for twins in the United States.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which we calculated cesarean delivery rates for twins from 1995 to 2008 using National Center for Health Statistics data. We compared cesarean delivery rates by year and for vertex compared with breech presentation. The order of presentation for a given twin pair could not be determined from the available records and therefore analysis was based on individual discrete twin data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate independent risk factors, including year of birth and maternal factors, for cesarean delivery.
Results: Cesarean delivery rates for twin births increased steadily from 53.4% to 75.0% in 2008. Rates rose for the breech twin category (81.5%-92.1%) and the vertex twin category (45.1%-68.2%). The relative increase in the cesarean delivery rate for preterm and term neonates was similar. After risk adjustment, there was an average increase noted in cesarean delivery of 5% each year during the study period (risk ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.05).
Conclusion: Cesarean delivery rates for twin births increased dramatically from 1995 to 2008. This increase is significantly higher than that which could be explained by an increase in cesarean delivery for breech presentation of either the presenting or second twin.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995-2008.Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;119(3):657-8; author reply 658-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318248be0b. Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22353970 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Trends in the delivery route of twin pregnancies in the United States, 2006-2013.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct;205:120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.031. Epub 2016 Aug 24. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27591713
-
Does internal podalic version of the non-vertex second twin still have a place in obstetrics? A Danish national retrospective cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Jan;94(1):59-64. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12521. Epub 2014 Nov 7. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015. PMID: 25283062
-
Breech births in twin pregnancy: an analysis of Apgar score and perinatal mortality from a Nigerian sample.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988 Aug;27(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(88)90081-1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988. PMID: 2905285
-
Caesarean section for preterm birth and, breech presentation and twin pregnancies.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;27(2):209-19. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 10. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013. PMID: 23062593 Review.
-
Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):336-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.125. Epub 2018 Nov 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30465748
Cited by
-
Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion for preventing postspinal hypotension during cesarean section for twin pregnancy: a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01562-3. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022. PMID: 34998371 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Delivery of the second twin: influence of presentation on neonatal outcome, a case controlled study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 18;18(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1815-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 29776396 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal Outcome of Second Twin with Respect to Mode of Delivery: An Observational Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):QC26-QC28. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21688.9112. Epub 2016 Dec 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016. PMID: 28208945 Free PMC article.
-
Trend in cesarean delivery rate among twin pregnancies over a 20 years epoch and the accompanied maternal and perinatal outcomes.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Apr 30;3:100023. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100023. eCollection 2019 Jul. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019. PMID: 31403115 Free PMC article.
-
Caesarean delivery in the Limbé and the Buea regional hospitals, Cameroon: frequency, indications and outcomes.Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Jul 13;24:227. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.24.227.9499. eCollection 2016. Pan Afr Med J. 2016. PMID: 27800082 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Mar;(35):1–8. - PubMed
-
- Aaronson D, Harlev A, Sheiner E, Levy A. Trial of labor after cesarean section in twin pregnancies: maternal and neonatal safety. J Matern Fetal Neona. 2010 Jun;23(6):550–554. - PubMed
-
- Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581–2589. - PubMed
-
- Oshiro BT, Henry E, Wilson J, Branch DW, Varner MW. Decreasing elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in an integrated health care system. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;113(4):804–811. - PubMed
-
- Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;112(3):661–666. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical